Well i have only played BFBC2 once and it was OK.. Only thing i didn't like was that the sniper you first unlock wasn't one hit kill in the chest only the head. And the really huge maps become confusing because i end up running in circles trying to find people and i die trying to find them. Also i dont like vehicles in MP it ruins the game people shooting rockets at you from 200 feet in the air yeah thats fair... But it does seem better than CoD but i still prefer CoD over Battlefield.

burntt0ad wrote Well i have only played BFBC2 once and it was OK.. Only thing i didn't like was that the sniper you first unlock wasn't one hit kill in the chest only the head. And the really huge maps become confusing because i end up running in circles trying to find people and i die trying to do find them. Also i dont like vehicles in MP it ruins the game people shooting rockets at you from 200 feet in the air yeah thats not really fair... But it does seem better than CoD but i still prefer CoD over Battlefield.

I know exactly what you mean. CoD plays a lot differently than BF. You have to use strategy and you have to know what your doing. Without that the game will be boring, lame, and confusing.

guys please dont just vote in the poll and leave. say why you voted the way you did. THX.

I think Battlefield will have better multiplayer than CoD yet CoD's campaign will be better. Overall I will get Battlefield rather than CoD because of their multiplayer's constant issues.

I have a question.
Me-What is so new to Battlefield 3?
You-I can destroy buildings!
Me-That's not new.
You-But... I have vehicles...
Me-That's not new and we have killstreaks which are pretty much vehicles.
You-... But I can destroy buildings...
Me-Sure you can bud... Sure you can.
To sum it all up, not much new to Battlefield either.

Muff_Cabbage wrote People say that CoD is nothing new but what's so revolutionary about BF3 besides a new engine? Oh wait, YOU CAN FINALLY GO PRONE. That's the only thing that's new to Battlefield.

MW3 > BF3

agreed. plus BF3 graphics aren't that good in multiplayer along wiht the first and second games aswell, their MP graphics were just horrible. i dislike BF it can't compare to CoD lmao,

-Makarov- wrote I have a question.
Me-What is so new to Battlefield 3?
You-I can destroy buildings!
Me-That's not new.
You-But... I have vehicles...
Me-That's not new and we have killstreaks which are pretty much vehicles.
You-... But I can destroy buildings...
Me-Sure you can bud... Sure you can.
To sum it all up, not much new to Battlefield either.

I assume your talking to OP, which is me. Killstreaks encourage camping, not objective play, which one do you prefer. Also, Battlefield promotes teamplay, and wide open maps with vehicles and more smooth gameplay.

-LinkinPark- wrote

Muff_Cabbage wrote @LinkinPark: No it won't. EA says this every year, yet their game hasn't been better than Activision's competitor.

I'm not gonna keep arguing with you because i seriously think what your saying is pathetic.

Watch this between 2:35 and 3:05 and see what Steven Spielberg himself has to say.

Oops I'm sorry I forgot that Steven Spielberg decides what game is better.

Look at the polls. It's obvious that MW3 is going to be the favorite this year.

P.S. MW3 is running on a new engine that was going to be called IW5 but since Sledgehammer helped with it they are calling it the MW3 engine.

@guy above me Number of people playing a game does not under any circumstances decide if any game is better than another.

Ambicidal wrote

Muff_Cabbage wrote People say that CoD is nothing new but what's so revolutionary about BF3 besides a new engine? Oh wait, YOU CAN FINALLY GO PRONE. That's the only thing that's new to Battlefield.

MW3 > BF3

'scuse me? The only new thing? No. Again, to the people who post in my thread, get your facts straight. Keep in mind new things aren't necessarily better. The classes have changed in BF3, engine is new(took a few years to make, and CoD is using same engine since cod4), suppressing fire feature(little is known), better sound quality and video quality, completely destructible environments(never been done). Battlefield has everything new. The only new thing I've seen with CoD is switching scopes, and if thats why your buying it then have fun bro. :trollin:

I said besides the engine but ok. MW3 has a new engine (as I mentioned in my most recent post), sound quality and video are part of the new engine, and destructible environments have been around since BF:BC. Nothing special.