You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Brexit could take up to two years
Posted:
Brexit could take up to two yearsPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 10, 20167Year Member
Posts: 25
Reputation Power: 0
Brexit could be delayed by months, even as long as two years, after a Supreme Court Judge suggested that "comprehensive" legislation was required to trigger Article 50.
The Supreme Court could adjudicate not just the validity of the Government's appeal against the ruling, but also the precise remedy the Government must offer to the claimants if it loses its appeal.
This means the Government could have to pass its Great Repeal Bill before triggering Article 50. The Great Repeal Bill is currently not planned to be introduced until the next session of Parliament after May.
Lady Hale, who will sit as one of the judges hearing the Government's appeal, also said unequivocally that the "referendum was not legally binding on Parliament".
This was a reference to the referendum legislation passed last year. She also confirmed that for the first time in its history the Supreme Court will sit with all 11 Justices.
No surprise at all this was going to happen, the government will drag this on as long as they possibly can.
I guess there is no real urgency to leave, and a good planned exit would be the best.
What's everyone's thoughts in the UK?
See full story:- [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
The Supreme Court could adjudicate not just the validity of the Government's appeal against the ruling, but also the precise remedy the Government must offer to the claimants if it loses its appeal.
This means the Government could have to pass its Great Repeal Bill before triggering Article 50. The Great Repeal Bill is currently not planned to be introduced until the next session of Parliament after May.
Lady Hale, who will sit as one of the judges hearing the Government's appeal, also said unequivocally that the "referendum was not legally binding on Parliament".
This was a reference to the referendum legislation passed last year. She also confirmed that for the first time in its history the Supreme Court will sit with all 11 Justices.
No surprise at all this was going to happen, the government will drag this on as long as they possibly can.
I guess there is no real urgency to leave, and a good planned exit would be the best.
What's everyone's thoughts in the UK?
See full story:- [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 20,220
Reputation Power: 1362
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 20,220
Reputation Power: 1362
We all knew it would be a long and angin process.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 17, 201310Year Member
Posts: 12,477
Reputation Power: 1973
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 17, 201310Year Member
Posts: 12,477
Reputation Power: 1973
What is Brexit?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 20168Year Member
Posts: 11,791
Reputation Power: 11040
Motto: 9nty.gg
Motto: 9nty.gg
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 20168Year Member
Posts: 11,791
Reputation Power: 11040
Motto: 9nty.gg
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 31,557
Reputation Power: 15112
They always like to prolong things
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,134
Reputation Power: 146
Status: Offline
Joined: May 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,134
Reputation Power: 146
-Oman- wrote Brexit could be delayed by months, even as long as two years, after a Supreme Court Judge suggested that "comprehensive" legislation was required to trigger Article 50.No shit, it's not a overnight process
The Supreme Court could adjudicate not just the validity of the Government's appeal against the ruling, but also the precise remedy the Government must offer to the claimants if it loses its appeal.
This means the Government could have to pass its Great Repeal Bill before triggering Article 50. The Great Repeal Bill is currently not planned to be introduced until the next session of Parliament after May.
Lady Hale, who will sit as one of the judges hearing the Government's appeal, also said unequivocally that the "referendum was not legally binding on Parliament".
This was a reference to the referendum legislation passed last year. She also confirmed that for the first time in its history the Supreme Court will sit with all 11 Justices.
No surprise at all this was going to happen, the government will drag this on as long as they possibly can.
I guess there is no real urgency to leave, and a good planned exit would be the best.
What's everyone's thoughts in the UK?
See full story:- [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.