You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
lei
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: May 03, 201410Year Member
Posts: 445
Reputation Power: 8
Status: Offline
Joined: May 03, 201410Year Member
Posts: 445
Reputation Power: 8
-Deano wrote
Oedipul wrote
-Deano wrote I agree to an extent. I would hate to see old favourites (Jet Set Radio is also one of mine) ruined by something being created as a 'tribute' to the past games.

I haven't really played many XYZ-HD remake games besides Halo and a couple of others.
Like the Halo anniversary model, you could play as either the classic Halo or as the newly revamped version... It kept the game the same and the Halo feeling was still intact.

I'm hoping that the New n Tasty remake coming out mid June will be all I expect of it. Oddworld: Abes Oddysee IS my childhood.

Oedipul wrote They made the game differently, they remade it, they made it with better quality, graphics, storyline, w/e. If you don't like it don't buy it.


:facepalm: So, how do you suppose we find out whether we like it or not without buying and playing the game??? You buy a remake expecting it to be brilliant like the original, not sceptical about whether you have just wasted your money.
If you don't like remakes don't buy them.



I don't know whether you just don't read what people put or are just ignorant...

So, by your logic you think that if you have one bad 'remake' then you should never buy any remakes ever again?
We were saying that whilst most are quite good, a few of the remakes aren't worth the money that you pay for them - Something which you won't know unless you put the money in to buy the game and try it out yourself.
Games don't just magically appear for free for you to play by staring blankly at your computer screen.
I'm pretty ignorant, not here to start fights though. It's your problem not mine.
#12. Posted:
BarbeR
  • Wise One
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 543
Reputation Power: 21
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 543
Reputation Power: 21
BSM wrote Not sure if anyone else has a problem with this, but I recently bought the Jet Set Radio Future , PC version. To try and bring back some memories and just because I felt like it was a game that shaped my childhood, so I load up the game and I realize RIGHT OFF the bat, this main menu is different, im like ok, I play the "tutorial" level and its entirely different, there is no free roam mode like in the original, its cut out pre determind follow the leader tutorial, nothing like the original version, the first mission is lame, its the same area except you are timed and there is no free roam mode, I do not remember being timed and I remember actually having to skate to the map area not just choosing it off of a map. Litterally everything about the game is different, I also know that the Final Fantasy HD remake they did, is not even a remake at all, they enhanced background things... thats not even a remake.

Why make a remake if you are not going to keep the game original...


I prefer having the remake being closer to the original, compare Perfect Dark XBLA to Perfect Dark 64, that's remake material, however Goldeneye 007 to CoD: Goldeneye is a text book example of what not to do in a remake.
#13. Posted:
prestonneil
  • Ladder Climber
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 320
Reputation Power: 11
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 320
Reputation Power: 11
Hd remakes are great and judt because u factor some not so great crap ones doesnt mean there are a ton of good ones for example: ffx (you got the international version) ratchet and clank hd, sly cooper collection, jak and daxter collection, halo 1 hd,dragon ball z BT collection, resident evil 4, fable 1, god of war, kingdom hearts hd.
There are some that sucks aka silent hill, tomb raider(it was okay), prince of persia!, and maybe a couple other ones low production
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.