Feels wrote

GraphiczHD wrote

Feels wrote

GraphiczHD wrote Hopefully Hazard gets one. He deserves a higher rating..

No he doesn't. His rating is perfectly fine.

lol. He was class last season, he should of stayed an 87.

Walcott was better, does that mean he warrants an 87 rating?

LOL! I think we've established that you know nothing about football..

iAmNG3 wrote

Feels wrote

GraphiczHD wrote

Feels wrote

GraphiczHD wrote Hopefully Hazard gets one. He deserves a higher rating..

No he doesn't. His rating is perfectly fine.

lol. He was class last season, he should of stayed an 87.

Walcott was better, does that mean he warrants an 87 rating?

I disagree and I agree.

I disagree that Walcott was better and if you're going to bring up numbers, I'm not even going to bother arguing....

I do however agree that 87 was too high for Hazard. an 85 is alright and if he keeps up his good form throughout the season, he should be an 86 in Fifa 15

Why, in most cases numbers tell you what you need to know.
Walcott had combined total of 25 goal created - 14 goals and 11 assists, Hazard had 22. I'm also pretty confident that Walcott created more chances as well. Hazard is probably a better player than Walcott, but Walcott doesn't get the recognition that he deserves.

Anyway, that's why I'm saying Hazard should be what rating he is. He didn't warrant being an 87 rated player.

Feels wrote

iAmNG3 wrote

Feels wrote

GraphiczHD wrote

Feels wrote

GraphiczHD wrote Hopefully Hazard gets one. He deserves a higher rating..

No he doesn't. His rating is perfectly fine.

lol. He was class last season, he should of stayed an 87.

Walcott was better, does that mean he warrants an 87 rating?

I disagree and I agree.

I disagree that Walcott was better and if you're going to bring up numbers, I'm not even going to bother arguing....

I do however agree that 87 was too high for Hazard. an 85 is alright and if he keeps up his good form throughout the season, he should be an 86 in Fifa 15

Why, in most cases numbers tell you what you need to know.
Walcott had combined total of 25 goal created - 14 goals and 11 assists, Hazard had 22. I'm also pretty confident that Walcott created more chances as well. Hazard is probably a better player than Walcott, but Walcott doesn't get the recognition that he deserves.

Anyway, that's why I'm saying Hazard should be what rating he is. He didn't warrant being an 87 rated player.

There's not much to be said if you rely on stats to judge football players....

so Walcott was better because he created 3 more goals? Lol. Hazard is a MUCH better player and definitely had a better season.

Like I said, 87 is a bit high, but he should definitely be in that 85-86 range...

Guys the ratings for all players are messed up... Messi has 76 long passing and Puyol has 76 jumping. BLASPHEMOUS.

iAmNG3 wrote

Feels wrote

iAmNG3 wrote

Feels wrote

GraphiczHD wrote

Feels wrote

GraphiczHD wrote Hopefully Hazard gets one. He deserves a higher rating..

No he doesn't. His rating is perfectly fine.

lol. He was class last season, he should of stayed an 87.

Walcott was better, does that mean he warrants an 87 rating?

I disagree and I agree.

I disagree that Walcott was better and if you're going to bring up numbers, I'm not even going to bother arguing....

I do however agree that 87 was too high for Hazard. an 85 is alright and if he keeps up his good form throughout the season, he should be an 86 in Fifa 15

Why, in most cases numbers tell you what you need to know.
Walcott had combined total of 25 goal created - 14 goals and 11 assists, Hazard had 22. I'm also pretty confident that Walcott created more chances as well. Hazard is probably a better player than Walcott, but Walcott doesn't get the recognition that he deserves.

Anyway, that's why I'm saying Hazard should be what rating he is. He didn't warrant being an 87 rated player.

There's not much to be said if you rely on stats to judge football players....

so Walcott was better because he created 3 more goals? Lol. Hazard is a MUCH better player and definitely had a better season.

Like I said, 87 is a bit high, but he should definitely be in that 85-86 range...

But you judge football on stats?
You can't say someone like Liverpool had a better season than Manchester United last season, because Man U won the league. It's the same principal.

I wanna know why you think Hazard had a better season than Walcott.
Walcott scored more, assisted more and created more.

rossi scored hatrick for fiorentina
ibra 2
cavani 2
ozil 2
hazard 2
palacio 2
muller 2