They don't even and shouldn't be compared. Michael Jordan of course.

Legacy wise, Jordan. As a player, Lebron.

Jordan by far. McCutchen is right. They should never be compared. Jordan could do anything and everything as player. LeBron not so much.

why would you even bring this up james has nothing on Jordan

Actually LeBron and Jordan shouldn't be compared as they played in two completely different eras so there is no real way to say who is better. Not even stats can show that.

DCHlEF wrote Actually LeBron and Jordan shouldn't be compared as they played in two completely different eras so there is no real way to say who is better. Not even stats can show that.

James has nothing on Jordan. I see where you coming from, but Jordan was good at everything he did. He could hit j's consistently. He could get inside, He was clutch, he one 6 titles which were two three peats. LeBron can penetrate but doesn't hit J's consistently. He's not as clutch as Jordan was. He isn't anything to be compared with the greatest to play.

SeanyBoy wrote

DCHlEF wrote Actually LeBron and Jordan shouldn't be compared as they played in two completely different eras so there is no real way to say who is better. Not even stats can show that.

James has nothing on Jordan. I see where you coming from, but Jordan was good at everything he did. He could hit j's consistently. He could get inside, He was clutch, he one 6 titles which were two three peats. LeBron can penetrate but doesn't hit J's consistently. He's not as clutch as Jordan was. He isn't anything to be compared with the greatest to play.

Lebron is getting better at jumpers. I am not a heat fan but I respect Lebron. If Lebron and Jordan played a 1v1, Lebron would over power Jordan with his strength. I know they are different positions. but both can play all positions. When Jordan was with the Wizards, he had the worst team record he had before. When Lebron was with the Cavaliers, he took them to the finals. If Jordan played in this era, he wouldn't win 6 rings, maybe 4 or 5, depends on the team. Lebron won't have a better legacy/career than Jordan, but he is a better player.

-Raven wrote

SeanyBoy wrote

DCHlEF wrote Actually LeBron and Jordan shouldn't be compared as they played in two completely different eras so there is no real way to say who is better. Not even stats can show that.

James has nothing on Jordan. I see where you coming from, but Jordan was good at everything he did. He could hit j's consistently. He could get inside, He was clutch, he one 6 titles which were two three peats. LeBron can penetrate but doesn't hit J's consistently. He's not as clutch as Jordan was. He isn't anything to be compared with the greatest to play.

Lebron is getting better at jumpers. I am not a heat fan but I respect Lebron. If Lebron and Jordan played a 1v1, Lebron would over power Jordan with his strength. I know they are different positions. but both can play all positions. When Jordan was with the Wizards, he had the worst team record he had before. When Lebron was with the Cavaliers, he took them to the finals. If Jordan played in this era, he wouldn't win 6 rings, maybe 4 or 5, depends on the team. Lebron won't have a better legacy/career than Jordan, but he is a better player.

He had the worst record because he was was like what 30 40 something? He was done when he came back. James was just a rookie, he was fresh out of college. That's a horrible comparison. At his prime no one can beat Jordan. Regardless of LeBrons size. Jordan is one of the best defenders if not the best. It's like saying Kevin Johnson can't dunk on Hakeem Olajuwon and what did he do? He went baseline and that little dude got over the dream! C'mon son. Jordan is the greatest of all time, in his prime he is unbeatable.

Michael Jordan he plays Shooting Guard and Lebron Plays Small Forward they shouldn't compared but i will go for Michael Jordan.

-Jay