You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
WW3 Theroies Wrong *READ*
Posted:

WW3 Theroies Wrong *READ*Posted:

ValorDesigns
  • TTG Natural
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 910
Reputation Power: 38
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 910
Reputation Power: 38
Hey guys im having a friendly arguement with the ww3 conspirasists this is a response to aces thread.

HERES THE THEORY
*ok 9/11,WTC "Attacked" and Pentagon "Attacked"
*Goverment says this is an "Act of Terrisom" <----- what a load of crap
*Rage war in iran <-----undercover war going on there
*now in Afganistain for 10 years <--- long war
*England comes and helps us fight aganist "Terrisom"
*corrupsoin happens in lyiba so we start to bomb and help and then lybia starts a war with the USA....probily by the end of 2011
*Isreal uprisig are happening there
*Isreal wants more power and invades a country,USA starts to help the other country even though were still in Afgan and iran
*China population is getting out of hand need more land and invade a country
*USA helps the other countries
*Russia desides to help out china
*There we go WW3 starts by 2017

-1st you need to understand terrorism to know the situation and if youve read my other thread it proved 9/11 conspirasists wrong so the foundation of this theory is already partially wrong.

-2nd i dont see how you can have an undercover war really and weve been at war with afghanistan so it would be no seceret. (not afghanistan directly)

-3rd england is in middle eastern countries for there own reasons such as need for resource so there not helping us they just happened to be there and now the taliban have attacked them so i could see england taking action against the taliban attacks but this does not mean theyre helping us.

-4th we are not bombing lybia the UN is bombing lybia let me just get this strait there are no us enrolled forces attacking lybia all american bombers are deployed by the UN so its not the us forcing this.

-5th israel would not invade another country they have no reason and they would not have a demand for power theres the UN to assure this doesnt happen and they could not take over the countries targeted if they needed to.

-6th China would not invade an outer country due to the isolation system that was created a long time ago around the 1100's they could not for multiple reasons if they wanted to and the government would probably start to enforce labor laws or acts to keep it under controll. you cant have more then 3 children i beleive in china so the rules may become harsh and i could see china killing its own people its been the countries nature for a while (sorry those of that race) however its been controlled but an outbreak could happen withing the feudal system.

-7th i dont know what countries the us would help but we wouldnt choose sides considering were pulling out of a war at the moment. if the theory was somehow correct then it would happen a long time ahead not 2017.

-8th Russia would not help china no matter what. the countries dont get along as it is. you need to go back to some ww1/ww2 history ot understand the conflict.

well that just shows how its wrong i did not write the theory so theres probably spelling mistakes
#2. Posted:
DaveUK
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 26, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,165
Reputation Power: 132
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 26, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,165
Reputation Power: 132
Thanks for this topic. History plays a big part in future wars.
#3. Posted:
ValorDesigns
  • TTG Natural
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 910
Reputation Power: 38
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 910
Reputation Power: 38
DaveUK wrote Thanks for this topic. History plays a big part in future wars.
yeah i dont think people understand history is the foundation for the future.
#4. Posted:
Holmesy
  • TTG Contender
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 02, 200914Year Member
Posts: 3,853
Reputation Power: 149
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 02, 200914Year Member
Posts: 3,853
Reputation Power: 149
yeah i agree with this post,the other post is wrong on so many things, also it's a 1 child policy in China not 3 ;)
#5. Posted:
ValorDesigns
  • TTG Natural
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 910
Reputation Power: 38
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 910
Reputation Power: 38
Holmesy wrote yeah i agree with this post,the other post is wrong on so many things, also it's a 1 child policy in China not 3 ;)
oh thankyou so much i just knew they had a rule i forgot how many (now that i think about it 3 is a lot) but yeah they have there ways to ensure overpopulation wont occur
#6. Posted:
ValorDesigns
  • TTG Natural
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 910
Reputation Power: 38
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201113Year Member
Posts: 910
Reputation Power: 38
aces post is getting bigger you should all start reading this one if you beleive him
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.