You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Has anyone played with 3 at back
Posted:

Has anyone played with 3 at backPosted:

Allan_2o14
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 23, 20149Year Member
Posts: 476
Reputation Power: 18
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 23, 20149Year Member
Posts: 476
Reputation Power: 18
As you see here is my team [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Ive never used 3 at the back before and always thought it was easy to get past it when playing against but really like the team and can't see it working with 100% Chem and 4 at the back unless yous guy think if of something different
#2. Posted:
Bankshot
  • Fairy Master
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 20, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,668
Reputation Power: 3542
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 20, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,668
Reputation Power: 3542
Allan_2o14 wrote As you see here is my team [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Ive never used 3 at the back before and always thought it was easy to get past it when playing against but really like the team and can't see it working with 100% Chem and 4 at the back unless yous guy think if of something different


I would use 5-2-1-2... works great for me.
#3. Posted:
Allan_2o14
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 23, 20149Year Member
Posts: 476
Reputation Power: 18
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 23, 20149Year Member
Posts: 476
Reputation Power: 18
Bankshot wrote
Allan_2o14 wrote As you see here is my team [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Ive never used 3 at the back before and always thought it was easy to get past it when playing against but really like the team and can't see it working with 100% Chem and 4 at the back unless yous guy think if of something different


I would use 5-2-1-2... works great for me.


Can you show me what you mean please ?
#4. Posted:
twistviperv2
  • TTG Natural
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 201211Year Member
Posts: 921
Reputation Power: 40
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 11, 201211Year Member
Posts: 921
Reputation Power: 40
Never hurts to try man, why not have a go? See if you like if not just switch it up but aid reccommend giving it a few games before changing because for me at least it takes a few games to get used to a formation or team
#5. Posted:
-Eriksen
  • 2 Million
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,414
Reputation Power: 63
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,414
Reputation Power: 63
if you give me 10 mins i could gety it to work
#6. Posted:
-Eriksen
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,414
Reputation Power: 63
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,414
Reputation Power: 63
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ] here you are mate:)
#7. Posted:
Allan_2o14
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 23, 20149Year Member
Posts: 476
Reputation Power: 18
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 23, 20149Year Member
Posts: 476
Reputation Power: 18
CaineBaii wrote [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] here you are mate:)


A like that mate really like that thank you ! Do
You think that's better than mine
#8. Posted:
-Eriksen
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,414
Reputation Power: 63
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,414
Reputation Power: 63
i do i dont like 3atb on this hame
#9. Posted:
Deftones
  • Winner!
Status: Offline
Joined: May 16, 201310Year Member
Posts: 8,519
Reputation Power: 1554
Status: Offline
Joined: May 16, 201310Year Member
Posts: 8,519
Reputation Power: 1554
3 at the back is a really attacking formation.
#10. Posted:
MickersSweatsTTG
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201211Year Member
Posts: 4,430
Reputation Power: 332
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201211Year Member
Posts: 4,430
Reputation Power: 332
Please save yourself the embarrassment! Try 433 false nine.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.