You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Community Discussion: Performance versus Aesthetics
Posted:
Community Discussion: Performance versus AestheticsPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 14, 200914Year Member
Posts: 3,871
Reputation Power: 1149
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 14, 200914Year Member
Posts: 3,871
Reputation Power: 1149
We have all heard the timeless debate about whether or not graphics matter. To many people, the gameplay is what sells a game. Crazy right, but how far can a game go before you simply sell an unfinished product? With some games using poor graphics as a novelty or charm, the line between what is publishable content becomes more and more obscure. PC gamers aren't pumping out hundreds to thousands of dollars just to push that FPS count from 200 to 250, it's all about the visuals for some games. From the small things like long distance rendering, to the up close and personal anti aliasing, everyone wants to play a good looking game, but if it isn't very fun the shine and sparkle dims very quickly.
Concluding question: Are visuals equally as important as gameplay, and if not, how far can you tolerate poor visual shortcomings?
Last edited by theartftw ; edited 1 time in total
The following 14 users thanked theartftw for this useful post:
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 201212Year Member
Posts: 2,297
Reputation Power: 155
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 201212Year Member
Posts: 2,297
Reputation Power: 155
I definitely would have to say that it is as equal as the game play. For me, gaming is about the experience and the overall content that's being delivered to me (the consumer).
I don't think a game is good if it doesn't have good graphics. It just doesn't cut it for me. While I do appreciate the content, I can't have one without the other. Again, it's all about the overall experience, and if I can't get that for some reason or another, I simply won't play the game.
It's late and I can't seem to express my thoughts properly. Hopefully it makes sense.
I don't think a game is good if it doesn't have good graphics. It just doesn't cut it for me. While I do appreciate the content, I can't have one without the other. Again, it's all about the overall experience, and if I can't get that for some reason or another, I simply won't play the game.
It's late and I can't seem to express my thoughts properly. Hopefully it makes sense.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 27, 201211Year Member
Posts: 853
Reputation Power: 34
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 10, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,874
Reputation Power: 1018
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 10, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,874
Reputation Power: 1018
Yes visuals are equally important as gameplay. I say this because I my self has played a lot of games. If the graphics or visuals whatever you prefer are bad it can really effect the gameplay. Simple games like "The Impossible Game" dont really focus on graphics and it doesnt matter about graphics, its an all gameplay kind of game. But if your playing like "Call of Duty" or "Batllefield" it could really mess everything up.
Yes.
Yes.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 29, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,512
Reputation Power: 2819
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 29, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,512
Reputation Power: 2819
Antichamber needs both
Call of duty 4 would be gameplay
Dear Esther would be aesthetic
tl;dr Depends on the game
/thread
Call of duty 4 would be gameplay
Dear Esther would be aesthetic
tl;dr Depends on the game
/thread
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 200914Year Member
Posts: 3,907
Reputation Power: 342
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 200914Year Member
Posts: 3,907
Reputation Power: 342
Visuals are not as important to gameplay. Visuals are a nice touch but can only wow you so much and for so long until there is something "better". The gameplay is what you remember and enjoy most, in my opinion.
The visuals department is something that is ever changing and always improving, it takes some real creativity to make the story line and gameplay of a game "better" than another's, not just some technological innovation which is bound to happen anyway.
I'll put it this way: I'd much rather play a game that looks like GTA Vice City and have the best gameplay of the year than some 1337 graphix yo and a pretty run of the mill game play like Call of Duty.
The visuals department is something that is ever changing and always improving, it takes some real creativity to make the story line and gameplay of a game "better" than another's, not just some technological innovation which is bound to happen anyway.
I'll put it this way: I'd much rather play a game that looks like GTA Vice City and have the best gameplay of the year than some 1337 graphix yo and a pretty run of the mill game play like Call of Duty.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 08, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,128
Reputation Power: 46
Status: Offline
Joined: May 08, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,128
Reputation Power: 46
If a game looks like crap I probably won't play. But it does mostly depend on gameplay. Minecraft isn't visually satisfying but it sure as hell is fun.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 12, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,639
Reputation Power: 108
Status: Offline
Joined: May 12, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,639
Reputation Power: 108
I believe that the dynamics of a video game counts and not the graphics. If you think about it, look at super mario, it is still an amazing game, it was made almost 30 years ago and it's still fun to play, and we never criticism the graphics only the gameplay. Overall i think that the performance is the key player in the whole scenario. I'm sure a lot of people would say the same thing.
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,778
Reputation Power: 3016
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 30, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,778
Reputation Power: 3016
Visuals is equally important as gameplay. Imagine playing Crisis 3 with 5 fps and a great story line. You would start the game and realize that you are running that low and never play it again until you have enough money to fork out a Titan that will run it smoothly at 60 fps. Now, if you can get that sweet spot of amazing gameplay and graphics it is an amazing and lovable game that you could play for days on end. Sorry if I don't sound right? I guess? I just got back on from doing siding of my grandparents house.
My conclusion: Yes, they are very important.
My conclusion: Yes, they are very important.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 10, 201311Year Member
Posts: 6,134
Reputation Power: 546
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 10, 201311Year Member
Posts: 6,134
Reputation Power: 546
I think visual graphics make a big difference in a game that doesn't have that much fun of gameplay. I can play a game if the graphics look good, but the gameplay isn't as fun as I wish. It's weird but that's how I play. I wouldn't be able stand playing a game that my area around me is just bland and something doesn't catch my eye. Like when Minecraft first came out, it was terrible looking. But as it updated and TP came out, the visual aspect of it made it better and a more enjoyable game. I can relate this to CoD4 also. In my opinion the maps and the buildings were just bland. But that's a very old game today. Comparing all the new FPS games to the older ones you can tell a big difference in the graphics. I
So to answer your question, I believe the visual aspects and graphics make the game more exciting. I feel if the graphics are terrible it effects the gameplay.
So to answer your question, I believe the visual aspects and graphics make the game more exciting. I feel if the graphics are terrible it effects the gameplay.
- 1useful
- 1not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.