Battlefield 1 not just muskets and trench warfare, says DICE

4.6
Battlefield 1 is going back to World War I, but that doesn’t mean there’ll be a downturn in variety of weapon, vehicle and gameplay.

“There’s this common misconception that WWI was just muskets or something,” lead designer Danny Berlin told Gamespot.

“But it wasn’t. It was a time of new weapons–bolt-action rifles, automatic rifles, semi-automatic rifles. The freedom we have is massive.”

“This was the first time ever that people saw light tanks, heavy tanks, armored trucks,” DICE design director Lars Gustavsson added.

“If you pop your head up from a trench and see a tank about to roll over you, you should get out of there. In the air, we have bombers to clear the way for your troops. If you’re in a bomber, you might want to have a buddy scouting for you on the ground. Dogfights with multiple people in planes, someone in the rear seat shooting at the person behind you. And of course battleships can demolish entire shorelines.”

Gustavsson said that DICE’s research made the team aware that World War I was the “dawn of all-out war”, with loads of different fronts to explore.

“This was a worldwide conflict. It stretched from China to Europe and all over the globe. Trench Warfare was just a small part of it. The fights in the deserts, the fights up in the mountains of Italy – there were so many things that I, at least, hadn’t heard about,” he said.

“I always thought the battle for oil started later, in the Second World War, but it started within this era. So we went from the picture you’re painting, but realized that there’s so much more to World War One than trench warfare. There was the invention of new technology, the need for new weapons, the creation of light machine guns.

“The world changed during WW1. There were four great empires that ceased to exist just because of it. Lots of great inventions came about during it, even things you don’t think about like trench coats and zippers and teabags.”



Posted:
Related Forum: Gaming Discussion

Source: http://www.vg247.com/2016/05/12/battlefield-1-muskets-trench-warfare/

Comments

"Battlefield 1 not just muskets and trench warfare, says DICE" :: Login/Create an Account :: 16 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

SeamPosted:

Muskets could have been a bit of a ball ache, glad that isnt going to be a thing.

farcry3321Posted:

COD is like being in a coma and there is know end sight just the same bs redirect every year

farcry3321Posted:

DTL
DJ_INSOMNiA
MushroomElm CoD: Uh..We got some space weapons? We'll have small maps. Uh, Campaign will suck as usual..Uh..Nothing really new..Uh..The game revolutionizes FPS, you guys buy that every year right?

BF 1: Were diving into rich history, exploring it as we work and finding things out that even we didn't know! We're making it expansive and actually enjoying creating this game!

I honestly don't see how CoD made it so far when it's just straight attack, where Battlefield has actual vehicles, large maps, etc and you have to plan and work as a team if you really want to get everything right.

This game is looking great, and the news I hear each time is just making it better while the only news CoD gets is how it's one of the most disliked games coming out, despite being top in the charts..


i couldn't agree more, i dont get the hype over CoD i feel like its mindless.


The reason why COD made it the "name brand" is due to the original Call of Duty's. If these weren't as good as they were, Battlefield would be the only game to buy every year. Due to the small/medium maps COD offers, it appeals to the majority of gamers, they don't want to be sitting on one map for 40+ minutes at a time. I really think if battlefield introduced some medium sized maps and provide a good feel to COD players, it will take over the FPS market within 2 years. Just my opinion.
then you sir haven't played battlefield before because EA HAS implement medium maps before just look at BF 4 as reference and I wouldn't want small maps because battlefield is known for there large and action packed game and one last notion FK cod its a garbage franchise

TechLifePosted:

At least someone is listening to the community. No more future crap baby!

DavethelegendPosted:

DJ_INSOMNiA
MushroomElm CoD: Uh..We got some space weapons? We'll have small maps. Uh, Campaign will suck as usual..Uh..Nothing really new..Uh..The game revolutionizes FPS, you guys buy that every year right?

BF 1: Were diving into rich history, exploring it as we work and finding things out that even we didn't know! We're making it expansive and actually enjoying creating this game!

I honestly don't see how CoD made it so far when it's just straight attack, where Battlefield has actual vehicles, large maps, etc and you have to plan and work as a team if you really want to get everything right.

This game is looking great, and the news I hear each time is just making it better while the only news CoD gets is how it's one of the most disliked games coming out, despite being top in the charts..


i couldn't agree more, i dont get the hype over CoD i feel like its mindless.


The reason why COD made it the "name brand" is due to the original Call of Duty's. If these weren't as good as they were, Battlefield would be the only game to buy every year. Due to the small/medium maps COD offers, it appeals to the majority of gamers, they don't want to be sitting on one map for 40+ minutes at a time. I really think if battlefield introduced some medium sized maps and provide a good feel to COD players, it will take over the FPS market within 2 years. Just my opinion.

DJ_INSOMNiAPosted:

MushroomElm CoD: Uh..We got some space weapons? We'll have small maps. Uh, Campaign will suck as usual..Uh..Nothing really new..Uh..The game revolutionizes FPS, you guys buy that every year right?

BF 1: Were diving into rich history, exploring it as we work and finding things out that even we didn't know! We're making it expansive and actually enjoying creating this game!

I honestly don't see how CoD made it so far when it's just straight attack, where Battlefield has actual vehicles, large maps, etc and you have to plan and work as a team if you really want to get everything right.

This game is looking great, and the news I hear each time is just making it better while the only news CoD gets is how it's one of the most disliked games coming out, despite being top in the charts..


i couldn't agree more, i dont get the hype over CoD i feel like its mindless.

MushroomElmPosted:

CoD: Uh..We got some space weapons? We'll have small maps. Uh, Campaign will suck as usual..Uh..Nothing really new..Uh..The game revolutionizes FPS, you guys buy that every year right?

BF 1: Were diving into rich history, exploring it as we work and finding things out that even we didn't know! We're making it expansive and actually enjoying creating this game!

I honestly don't see how CoD made it so far when it's just straight attack, where Battlefield has actual vehicles, large maps, etc and you have to plan and work as a team if you really want to get everything right.

This game is looking great, and the news I hear each time is just making it better while the only news CoD gets is how it's one of the most disliked games coming out, despite being top in the charts..

MickersPosted:

Literally just so pumped for this game.

Boss34Posted:

This games going to be amazing to play!

SupervisorPosted:

This game looks so great!