Video: SHGames interview “What Makes CoD Advanced Warfare Different?”

4.2
As part of GameInformer’s month long exclusive coverage on Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, they have just released a new video interview with Sledgehammer Games founders Glen Schofield and Michael Condrey. They discuss what makes Advanced Warfare different along with changes they made to the core gameplay. Take a look:






Posted:
Related Forum: Call of Duty Forum

Source: http://www.charlieintel.com/2014/05/07/what-makes-advanced-warfare-different-video-interview-with-gameinformer/

Comments

"Video: SHGames interview “What Makes CoD Advanced Warfare Different?”" :: Login/Create an Account :: 95 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

DanimalsPosted:

Solve Multiplayer confirmed! Haha


well of course it is. thats what makes call of duty

chuckygreenPosted:

lolohnoeszsz
El_Oso_Blanco
lolohnoeszsz
El_Oso_Blanco
lolohnoeszsz
CherryPoppins
lolohnoeszsz
CherryPoppins
lolohnoeszsz
-Swift
lolohnoeszsz
-Swift
lolohnoeszsz
-Swift The thing that pisses me off about everyone in this community is that you give nothing a chance. This game has been in development for 3 God damn years. If you think its going to be the same as Ghosts or MW3 you are out of your mind. When Titanfall getting interviews like this everyone was saying "Lets Go", "I can't wait", "This is going to be awesome". And with a game that is being made by a company that has never made a Call of Duty before, besides the Single Player campaign of Modern Warfare 3(Which was one of the best I might add), you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about when you say "this game is going to be like the others.

/minirant
why give something a chance when they lost their chance years ago? no matter how much polish you put on a turd it'll still look like sh!t.


Lost their chance? Did you even read what I said? or better yet do you even know what games Sledgehammer Games have made? Cause its pretty hard to lose a chance at a game when they are yet to make one.
yes i did read your comment. as for SHG they helped IW and Raven make MW3 which was garbage.


Yeah the multiplayer was garbage I agree with that. But SH Games had nothing to do with the multiplayer. They helped with the single player.
nah all 3 companies equally put time into everything. plus the design of CoD: AW mimics Titanfall and i already own that game. not buying a cod version of TF (literally).


if you still have faith in cod you need help
? who said i had faith in cod? i lost faith after MW2 came out.


mw2 was amazing, went down hill when mw3 came out
yeah commando, oma, noobtubes, OP killstreaks, camper friendly maps, unbalanced gameplay, danger close and stopping power, and quickscoping.

that sound amazing to you?


You can't use that as an excuse because after the third title update there was no one at Infinity Ward to fix the problems with the game most everybody left. Also killstreaks were not op you were just to lazy to shoot the **** down, every fps has campers, unbalanced I don't think you know the definition, stopping power was what made the game balance.

1. [citation needed]

2. yes they were lets list them we got: pred missle, harrier, pavelow, chopper gunner, AC-130, and the nuke. if you think those aren't OP then you're an idiot. also i shot down my fair share of air killstreaks. just because they can be shot down doesn't mean they're OP.

3. there were a ridiculous amount of campers. and the oma/noobtubes made everyone camp harder because everybody wanted a nuke. care to prove me wrong?

4. stopping power had no counter like it did in waw and cod 4. the extra damage it gave broke the game. it was a matter of if you didn't have stopping power you would lose almost every gun fight against someone with stopping power.


also please stop being so delusional.


Most everything could be shot down or destroyed there for they were not op. The streaks were so easy to get because the game was easy to play plus you could easily find who ever was going for the nuke and kill him whether he was camping or not.

I also say again what shooter has no campers. Again OMA and noobtubes were never fixed because there was no one there to fix them.

I don't know what kind of player you were but I ran other perks besides stopping power and was still able to kill people fine you are just making excuses.
1. yes they were someone with a chopper gunner could get a nuke in 30 seconds flat.

2. streaks were easy to get because of the system they used. i get a pred missle kill 6 people and boom i have a pavelow. plus noobtubes and oma and danger close made this more of a problem.

3. i never said no game had camping now did i? plus the thing you're referring to happened about mid 2010 about the same time we got the first map pack am i right? they had 5+ months and still couldn't decide whether not OMA was OP or not. and even with the team they had they still could of nerfed it.

4. i was a decent player and i still killed my fair share of users with SP. but that's not the point the point is if you didn't have SP you would die.




anyway i'm not going to get into a 5 page argument with you. you keep your opinions to yourself and i'll keep mine thanks.


i think you just maybe were really really bad from your argument points which are awful.

SolvePosted:

Multiplayer confirmed! Haha

PoonPosted:

going to be the same thing, Grenade spammers, Shotgunners, Dropshotters, C4s, and Trickshotters, same crap different game.

Emokid562Posted:

Man if this sucks ima be done with COD.

1993Posted:

Don't know if I'm gonna by this, but if one of my mates buy it I'll give it ago and see what its like & and I'll think on buying it

gmlukensPosted:

Corncake I liked the cod games because they were like historical battles, I guess the ran out and had to make their own


Jesus, people aren't even trying anymore to write comments that are worthwhile.

CorncakePosted:

I liked the cod games because they were like historical battles, I guess the ran out and had to make their own

RX8Posted:

El_Oso_Blanco
lolohnoeszsz
El_Oso_Blanco
lolohnoeszsz
El_Oso_Blanco
lolohnoeszsz
CherryPoppins
lolohnoeszsz
CherryPoppins
lolohnoeszsz
-Swift
lolohnoeszsz
-Swift
lolohnoeszsz
-Swift The thing that pisses me off about everyone in this community is that you give nothing a chance. This game has been in development for 3 God damn years. If you think its going to be the same as Ghosts or MW3 you are out of your mind. When Titanfall getting interviews like this everyone was saying "Lets Go", "I can't wait", "This is going to be awesome". And with a game that is being made by a company that has never made a Call of Duty before, besides the Single Player campaign of Modern Warfare 3(Which was one of the best I might add), you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about when you say "this game is going to be like the others.

/minirant
why give something a chance when they lost their chance years ago? no matter how much polish you put on a turd it'll still look like sh!t.


Lost their chance? Did you even read what I said? or better yet do you even know what games Sledgehammer Games have made? Cause its pretty hard to lose a chance at a game when they are yet to make one.
yes i did read your comment. as for SHG they helped IW and Raven make MW3 which was garbage.


Yeah the multiplayer was garbage I agree with that. But SH Games had nothing to do with the multiplayer. They helped with the single player.
nah all 3 companies equally put time into everything. plus the design of CoD: AW mimics Titanfall and i already own that game. not buying a cod version of TF (literally).


if you still have faith in cod you need help
? who said i had faith in cod? i lost faith after MW2 came out.


mw2 was amazing, went down hill when mw3 came out
yeah commando, oma, noobtubes, OP killstreaks, camper friendly maps, unbalanced gameplay, danger close and stopping power, and quickscoping.

that sound amazing to you?


You can't use that as an excuse because after the third title update there was no one at Infinity Ward to fix the problems with the game most everybody left. Also killstreaks were not op you were just to lazy to shoot the **** down, every fps has campers, unbalanced I don't think you know the definition, stopping power was what made the game balance.

1. [citation needed]

2. yes they were lets list them we got: pred missle, harrier, pavelow, chopper gunner, AC-130, and the nuke. if you think those aren't OP then you're an idiot. also i shot down my fair share of air killstreaks. just because they can be shot down doesn't mean they're OP.

3. there were a ridiculous amount of campers. and the oma/noobtubes made everyone camp harder because everybody wanted a nuke. care to prove me wrong?

4. stopping power had no counter like it did in waw and cod 4. the extra damage it gave broke the game. it was a matter of if you didn't have stopping power you would lose almost every gun fight against someone with stopping power.


also please stop being so delusional.


Most everything could be shot down or destroyed there for they were not op. The streaks were so easy to get because the game was easy to play plus you could easily find who ever was going for the nuke and kill him whether he was camping or not.

I also say again what shooter has no campers. Again OMA and noobtubes were never fixed because there was no one there to fix them.

I don't know what kind of player you were but I ran other perks besides stopping power and was still able to kill people fine you are just making excuses.
1. yes they were someone with a chopper gunner could get a nuke in 30 seconds flat.

2. streaks were easy to get because of the system they used. i get a pred missle kill 6 people and boom i have a pavelow. plus noobtubes and oma and danger close made this more of a problem.

3. i never said no game had camping now did i? plus the thing you're referring to happened about mid 2010 about the same time we got the first map pack am i right? they had 5+ months and still couldn't decide whether not OMA was OP or not. and even with the team they had they still could of nerfed it.

4. i was a decent player and i still killed my fair share of users with SP. but that's not the point the point is if you didn't have SP you would die.




anyway i'm not going to get into a 5 page argument with you. you keep your opinions to yourself and i'll keep mine thanks.


Fine your just making excuses anyway.


those things made mw2 fun. it was the second most innovational cod ever, cod4 being the first.

MajPosted:

There is no difference its the same as all the other COD Games