Halo 4 Multiplayer Introduces Perks, 343i Assures "Halo’s not Call of Duty"

4.7
Earlier today, 343 Industries gave Halo fans and inside look at the upcoming sequel, Halo 4. If you missed it, you can check it out right here. Not only did we get to see how the campaign is shaping up, but we also got our first glimpse at Halo 4′s multiplayer.

With the exception of the fact that maps are being developed with the competitive audience in mind, that the Battlerifle will be making a return and that the multiplayer will be more connected to the lore of Halo, much info has yet to be revealed. Luckily, Eurogamer was able to learn an interesting fact: Halo 4′s multiplayer will introduce a system similar to Call of Duty’s perks and Battlefield’s specializations. It has been revealed that players will be able to fully customize their Spartan IV’s armor, much like previous Halo titles, but which will now directly affect the gameplay.

This is obviously a fairly drastic change to the already well-established Halo-style gameplay. Franchise Director, Frank O’Connor admits, “I expect a variety of different reactions.” However, he made it clear, “we’ve a tremendous amount of respect for Bungie and for the universe that they created, and yet we do want to take our own unique view on Halo and on where we want to take the franchise is in the future. It’s about finding the balance so it’s still Halo yet still feels fresh.”

Apparently, this isn’t the only thing that may trigger some passionate reactions among the community. ”What we showed today is in some ways really traditional. Some of the more revolutionary stuff that we’re going to be doing is going to create more fuss, and I think it’s going to be mostly positive fuss, as it’s all been carefully thought out and considered.”

So far, the reactions to this new gameplay mechanic have been accusatory of 343 Industries essentially copying the gameplay of shooters like Call of Duty and Battlefield. O’Connor assures, “what we do take very seriously is changing player habits. So rather than chasing Call of Duty or Battlefield and trying to do their thing and doing it poorly and doing injustice to it, we’re trying to do our own thing, and do something fairly original but still something that’s completely compatible with the Halo universe.” He continued, “Halo’s not Call of Duty. Halo’s a sandbox game about really emergent things. A lot of things that worked great about Call of Duty – and don’t get me wrong, I was addicted Black Ops all of last year – they do player rewards really well. We’re not trying to do the same thing, it’s as simple as that. We’re trying to do something else, and to push our game forwards and not theirs.”

What O’Connor seems to be trying to push to fans is that 343 Industries is ”not chasing anybody else’s tail – all the pressure comes from inside.”

Posted:

Source: http://mp1st.com/2012/03/05/halo-4-multiplayer-introduces-perks-343i-assures-halos-not-call-of-duty/

Comments

"Halo 4 Multiplayer Introduces Perks, 343i Assures "Halo’s not Call of Duty"" :: Login/Create an Account :: 86 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

POLYSICSPosted:

liqour_man
Jacob8hockey
TTG_Crysis Haha lol all you kids rad on Halo Reach like its an unplayable title or something. It didn't get a 9.5/10 rating for a reason. Halo 3 sucked in my opinion compared to Reach. The graphics are 1.5x better in Reach, they made the guns more balanced and interesting, forge was fixed, added abilitys, better servers, etc, etc and etc. This WASN'T a copy and paste game like Call of Duty, it was pretty much built from scratch, unlike Call of Duty where they just make new gun skins, new maps, and thats it. The only reason i don't play reach anymore is because no one on my friends list plays it, if more played it i would be happy to play it.

You definetly did not play Halo 3 when it came out. It is beyond amazing compared to what it was able to bring into games back in 2007. You can't say Halo 3 sucks, it was by far one of the best games created. Clearly you got Reach before Halo 3.
wow...I was going to say that to him. Nicely put btw, I doubt he played halo 3 or 2 before reach and if he did he didn't play it enough or stopped playing it because he couldn't get a 50. So he likes reach because you can be bad and it wouldnt even be noticed in reach because their I'd nor ranks.
I like how he thinks graphics make a game 10x better. I still play **** NES and N64 for christ's sake and the games on there are better than half the games made today.

You obviously DID NOT play Halo 3 before Reach, or probably not even any of the older games when they came out. To refute your rating statement, Halo 3 did not get a 9.8/10 for no reason; Halo 3 infinitely better than Reach. You probably just could never rank up in Halo 3, and because people out BR'd you. Just because you can't sprint away or make yourself invincible in the middle of a confrontation doesn't mean the game is bad. Graphics don't mean shit.

liqour_manPosted:

Jacob8hockey
TTG_Crysis Haha lol all you kids rad on Halo Reach like its an unplayable title or something. It didn't get a 9.5/10 rating for a reason. Halo 3 sucked in my opinion compared to Reach. The graphics are 1.5x better in Reach, they made the guns more balanced and interesting, forge was fixed, added abilitys, better servers, etc, etc and etc. This WASN'T a copy and paste game like Call of Duty, it was pretty much built from scratch, unlike Call of Duty where they just make new gun skins, new maps, and thats it. The only reason i don't play reach anymore is because no one on my friends list plays it, if more played it i would be happy to play it.

You definetly did not play Halo 3 when it came out. It is beyond amazing compared to what it was able to bring into games back in 2007. You can't say Halo 3 sucks, it was by far one of the best games created. Clearly you got Reach before Halo 3.
wow...I was going to say that to him. Nicely put btw, I doubt he played halo 3 or 2 before reach and if he did he didn't play it enough or stopped playing it because he couldn't get a 50. So he likes reach because you can be bad and it wouldnt even be noticed in reach because their I'd nor ranks.

3OH3Posted:

WPSpy
3OH3
Zaragoza
3OH3
Zaragoza I feel like this is going to be the worst halo yet. They are trying too hard, all they need is a simple remake of halo 3 but with diff. guns, maps and campaign...


That's a joke right? That's exactly what call of duty does which is completely retarded. It's an entire new game so might as well make it one.

Copy and paste games are trash... Just like call of duty has become.

So you are saying that halo reach is a good game because they added jet packs and other gay add ons and the stupid guns they added. Like i said, i want a remake of Halo 3, this is my opinion, if i wanted yours i would've asked. And frankly i think the call of duties way better than Halo Reach. I would choose the play viva pinata over halo reach. That is the worst game out. And next is halo 4.

I own both viva pinata and Halo Reach and I can say that I'd rather play Reach....lol
And I thought that Halo Reach was different and added a new aspect to the game. The jetpacks and other perks added many more options when making custom games and made you think a little more in the multiplayer. I personally didn't think it was all that bad.


are you serious? Halo reach was a complete failure.. Even though call of duty keeps doing the same thing over and over, its sales keep increasing drastically every year. Halo Reach, however failed .. probably because they attempted to add new things that halo fans didn't like. personally halo 3 was the best game on xbox.. and a remake with very few changes would be just fine.
I never said I didn't like Halo 3. It's easily my favorite game... I'm just saying that I'm always up for something new

AsPaPuLcEPosted:

xSHiiFT
3OH3
Zaragoza
3OH3
Zaragoza I feel like this is going to be the worst halo yet. They are trying too hard, all they need is a simple remake of halo 3 but with diff. guns, maps and campaign...


That's a joke right? That's exactly what call of duty does which is completely retarded. It's an entire new game so might as well make it one.

Copy and paste games are trash... Just like call of duty has become.

So you are saying that halo reach is a good game because they added jet packs and other gay add ons and the stupid guns they added. Like i said, i want a remake of Halo 3, this is my opinion, if i wanted yours i would've asked. And frankly i think the call of duties way better than Halo Reach. I would choose the play viva pinata over halo reach. That is the worst game out. And next is halo 4.

I own both viva pinata and Halo Reach and I can say that I'd rather play Reach....lol
And I thought that Halo Reach was different and added a new aspect to the game. The jetpacks and other perks added many more options when making custom games and made you think a little more in the multiplayer. I personally didn't think it was all that bad.
Halo 3 doesn't need a remake since its on the 360. Games that need remakes are for older consoles. (ie Halo 2 and such)

my point is that they need to leave out all the stupid perks and shit and leave it original like halo 2 and 3

M14Posted:

I hope Halo 4's "perks" are things that have to do with adding extra armor pieces and things like that. With things like Slight of hand or rapid fire, it won't feel like Halo anymore.

AsPaPuLcEPosted:

WPSpy
3OH3
Zaragoza
3OH3
Zaragoza I feel like this is going to be the worst halo yet. They are trying too hard, all they need is a simple remake of halo 3 but with diff. guns, maps and campaign...


That's a joke right? That's exactly what call of duty does which is completely retarded. It's an entire new game so might as well make it one.

Copy and paste games are trash... Just like call of duty has become.

So you are saying that halo reach is a good game because they added jet packs and other gay add ons and the stupid guns they added. Like i said, i want a remake of Halo 3, this is my opinion, if i wanted yours i would've asked. And frankly i think the call of duties way better than Halo Reach. I would choose the play viva pinata over halo reach. That is the worst game out. And next is halo 4.

I own both viva pinata and Halo Reach and I can say that I'd rather play Reach....lol
And I thought that Halo Reach was different and added a new aspect to the game. The jetpacks and other perks added many more options when making custom games and made you think a little more in the multiplayer. I personally didn't think it was all that bad.


are you serious? Halo reach was a complete failure.. Even though call of duty keeps doing the same thing over and over, its sales keep increasing drastically every year. Halo Reach, however failed .. probably because they attempted to add new things that halo fans didn't like. personally halo 3 was the best game on xbox.. and a remake with very few changes would be just fine.

Thank you...

Jacob8hockeyPosted:

TTG_Crysis Haha lol all you kids rad on Halo Reach like its an unplayable title or something. It didn't get a 9.5/10 rating for a reason. Halo 3 sucked in my opinion compared to Reach. The graphics are 1.5x better in Reach, they made the guns more balanced and interesting, forge was fixed, added abilitys, better servers, etc, etc and etc. This WASN'T a copy and paste game like Call of Duty, it was pretty much built from scratch, unlike Call of Duty where they just make new gun skins, new maps, and thats it. The only reason i don't play reach anymore is because no one on my friends list plays it, if more played it i would be happy to play it.

You definetly did not play Halo 3 when it came out. It is beyond amazing compared to what it was able to bring into games back in 2007. You can't say Halo 3 sucks, it was by far one of the best games created. Clearly you got Reach before Halo 3.

Master_CheifPosted:

It better not be like CoD.

TTG_CrysisPosted:

Haha lol all you kids rad on Halo Reach like its an unplayable title or something. It didn't get a 9.5/10 rating for a reason. Halo 3 sucked in my opinion compared to Reach. The graphics are 1.5x better in Reach, they made the guns more balanced and interesting, forge was fixed, added abilitys, better servers, etc, etc and etc. This WASN'T a copy and paste game like Call of Duty, it was pretty much built from scratch, unlike Call of Duty where they just make new gun skins, new maps, and thats it. The only reason i don't play reach anymore is because no one on my friends list plays it, if more played it i would be happy to play it.

WPSpyPosted:

3OH3
Zaragoza
3OH3
Zaragoza I feel like this is going to be the worst halo yet. They are trying too hard, all they need is a simple remake of halo 3 but with diff. guns, maps and campaign...


That's a joke right? That's exactly what call of duty does which is completely retarded. It's an entire new game so might as well make it one.

Copy and paste games are trash... Just like call of duty has become.

So you are saying that halo reach is a good game because they added jet packs and other gay add ons and the stupid guns they added. Like i said, i want a remake of Halo 3, this is my opinion, if i wanted yours i would've asked. And frankly i think the call of duties way better than Halo Reach. I would choose the play viva pinata over halo reach. That is the worst game out. And next is halo 4.

I own both viva pinata and Halo Reach and I can say that I'd rather play Reach....lol
And I thought that Halo Reach was different and added a new aspect to the game. The jetpacks and other perks added many more options when making custom games and made you think a little more in the multiplayer. I personally didn't think it was all that bad.


are you serious? Halo reach was a complete failure.. Even though call of duty keeps doing the same thing over and over, its sales keep increasing drastically every year. Halo Reach, however failed .. probably because they attempted to add new things that halo fans didn't like. personally halo 3 was the best game on xbox.. and a remake with very few changes would be just fine.