Rockstar owner argues players ‘are ready for $70 games’

The CEO of Take-Two has reiterated his view that the decision to charge $69.99 for the next-gen versions of NBA 2K21 was the correct one, because the public was “ready” for a price increase.

Speaking during the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference this week (transcribed by VGC), Take-Two boss Strauss Zelnick was asked for his views on the reaction to NBA 2K21’s price point and what it means for game prices in the future.

“We announced a $70 price point for NBA 2K21, our view was that we’re offering an array of extraordinary experiences, lots of replayability, and the last time there was a frontline price increase in the US was 2005, 2006, so we think consumers were ready for it,” Zelnick replied.

He did stop short, however, of suggesting that future games will cost $70 going forwards, instead suggesting that the company needs to focus on providing a level of content that justifies that price point.

“We haven’t said anything about pricing other titles so far, and we tend to make announcements on a title-by-title basis, but I think our view is [that we want to] always deliver more value than what we charge, make sure the consumer has the experience and[…] the experience of paying for it, both are positive experiences,” he explained.

“We all know anecdotally that even if you love a consumer experience, if you feel you were overcharged for it, it ruins the experience, you don’t want to have it again. [If you] go to a great restaurant, a really really fine restaurant, have a great meal and great service, then you get a check that’s double what you think it should be, you’re never going back.”

He added: “So we always want to make sure that consumers feel like we deliver much more than we ask in return, and that’s true for our current consumer spending as well. We’re an entertainment company, we’re here to captivate and engage consumers, and if we do that then monetisation follows.”

NBA 2K21 was the first next-gen game to be officially priced at $70. When the price was announced last August, Zelnick defended the decision, saying: “We think with the value we offer consumers…and the kind of experience you can really only have on these next-generation consoles, that the price is justified.”

The issue of next-gen prices is a divisive one, and publishers have yet to find a common ground. In November, Sony Interactive Entertainment CEO Jim Ryan defended the company’s decision to price select first-party PS5 games at $70, such as Demon’s Souls and Marvel’s Spider-Man: Miles Morales Ultimate Edition.

Speaking last July, Ubisoft said that its first wave of next-gen games wouldn’t cost more than the current-gen versions, a statement that turned out to be correct. However, the publisher didn’t rule out PS5 and Xbox Series X releases post-Christmas 2020 coming at a premium price.

Speaking to the Washington Post last year, Xbox head Phil Spencer was non-committal on the subject, stating: “As an industry, we can price things whatever we want to price them, and the customer will decide what the right price is for them.

“I’m not negative on people setting a new price point for games because I know everybody’s going to drive their own decisions based on their own business needs. But gamers have more choice today than they ever have. In the end, I know the customer is in control of the price that they pay, and I trust that system.”

Related Forum: Grand Theft Auto Forum



"Rockstar owner argues players ‘are ready for $70 games’" :: Login/Create an Account :: 5 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.


i can tell you right now as a person who pay 93$ that=70$+gst+qst, no one is ready to pay that price when the games arent even full games, id pay 35$ to 40$ max for a new game that should have all content day one(if its in the files it should be in game without a gotcha system).

id gladly pay 60$ again i miss the days when games where 60$, but yeah no ones ready to pay 120$ for new games now(it might be like 110$ for me due to two sales tax)

if anything that would make people go to pc and buy said game for like 5$ cheaper(idk where people find games for 30% off)


GTA is a game most people would be fine paying $70 as its such a massive project and so much work has been put into it. NBA 2K21 is a bloody copy and paste job just like every NBA game before it as well as having ads in the game itself. Dunnno how they can jusitfy it on any game they have other than GTA


No the players are ready for free games because every dev needs to add microtransactions out the ass. Rockstar has some good games, but damn they are one of the most money hungry companies in gaming


I wouldn't say I'm ready for them, I purely accept it. I'd rather not payt 70$ for a game, most games I've spent over 70$ on have been a huge let down, I've been enjoying games that are way cheaper.. such as Valheim and many others that don't leave a dent in a paycheck.


(x) doubted heavily

nobody agrees

Gaming Headlines