Treyarch on Tweaks for Black Ops and “Next” Call of Duty

4
Call of Duty: Black Ops Developer, David Vonderhaar, has been rather active on the official Black Ops forums lately searching for feedback on various gameplay and balance matters.

One question we are asking is if this feedback is to be used to improve Black Ops, or will it be factored into their next title, be it Black Ops 2 or something completely different. So far, we’ve already seen some major changes to Black Ops gameplay fairly late into it’s life, including weapon balancing, playlists, and perks like Last Stand. It would not be crazy to assume more changes are on their way, but meanwhile, we can begin to get a general idea of the direction Treyarch might be headed in with their next project. For now, you should check out the Unofficial Feedback Thread and Unofficial Knife Feedback Thread that Vonderhaar has set up to gather feedback.

Vonderhaar has stressed that he’s reading all comments on these threads, so it would be a great place to have your voice heard.

Many fans have been showing appreciation for Treyarch’s willingness to learn and implement new improvements/ideas into Black Ops. Vonderhaar mentions that “You have to challenge assumptions. I don’t want to change just because we could. Finding the right things is important.” Treyarch recently implemented the option to turn aim assist for consoles in the multiplayer and was asked if there were any plans to create playlists that enforce this feature. Vonderhaar states, “yes. It could be enforced at a playlist level. Not sure how popular it would be, but am thinking of a way to deal with that.” One of the more controversial ideas that Vonderhaar has been looking for feedback on is the ability to unlock weapons permanently through prestiging. “We have these ‘traditions’ of doing things a certain way. Prestige relocking gameplay content being one.” Perhaps it’s time to break these traditions in order for Call of Duty to really move forward. In response to one fan stating that all of these changes could have been tested earlier in a Beta, had they implemented one, Vonderhaar noted that “it would be ridiculously beneficial to be able to test out this stuff now in black ops so its perfect for the ‘next game.’”

It seems we live in a day and age when it’s more and more acceptable for games with a strong multiplayer community like Call of Duty to be tweaked and changed, days, months, or years after release. Do you agree with this dynamic way of updating games, or should they be “perfect” from the get-go. Also, what would you like to see in the “next” Call of Duty?

Posted:

Source: http://mp1st.com/2011/12/02/treyarch-on-tweaks-for-black-ops-and-next-call-of-duty/

Comments

"Treyarch on Tweaks for Black Ops and “Next” Call of Duty" :: Login/Create an Account :: 110 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

MrLeggitBossPosted:

i dont care what anyone says treyarch is the best game creaters.. waw wasnt that good but black ops was amazing! i hope they stick with the same design as black ops but with some new ideas added on

VicePosted:

I will play an try out any cod. I am a fan of cod no matter which developer I will play there game, I tend to like mw better than black ops only for quick scoping an the different feeling on the game itself. People on ttg can't stand black ops because you couldn't even boost without getting reset or banned. Which was annoying because playing legit can get boring you cant lie. I look forward to a new trey arch game so I can try it out,
(:

VeNoMxMoDzPosted:

RealLoso
triksta2k11
-Spirit
Jacob8hockey Shitty situation for Treyarch. They try to do everything right and even get the fans opinions but still end up making a game that is disliked. They really have the potential to make the better cods because they try harder and are creative about the games.
black ops was good alot of people enjoyed it but people on ttg didn't like it because it took skill to be good at and MW2 didn't so they blame the game because it was to hard for them

Exactly. Also Treyarch made an ORIGIONAL story line. Which is usually something I don't normaly play but it was great. The maps were good but not brilliant and I hope that they either make a WaW based game or Black Ops 2 like it says.


Lmao exactly for some reason the retards on this site dont like treyarch cause it actually took skills to play on their game, an they all sucked at it they rather go on MW2 and MW3 &just Noobtube to get easy kills

I agree 100% with you. i never really liked any of the MW Games, just because there are so many little kids on those games that make it a living hell for other people like me to play the game, and i hate the style of the game. and it is waaaay to easy to kill people with the overpowered guns IW made. I think black ops was for sure the best CoD

VeNoMxMoDzPosted:

RichyG36 treyarch should just make zombie games and let the pro's like activision and infinity ward take over. for good

lol sorry but activision isnt the developer... they are the publisher for every call of duty...

RealLosoPosted:

triksta2k11
-Spirit
Jacob8hockey Shitty situation for Treyarch. They try to do everything right and even get the fans opinions but still end up making a game that is disliked. They really have the potential to make the better cods because they try harder and are creative about the games.
black ops was good alot of people enjoyed it but people on ttg didn't like it because it took skill to be good at and MW2 didn't so they blame the game because it was to hard for them

Exactly. Also Treyarch made an ORIGIONAL story line. Which is usually something I don't normaly play but it was great. The maps were good but not brilliant and I hope that they either make a WaW based game or Black Ops 2 like it says.


Lmao exactly for some reason the retards on this site dont like treyarch cause it actually took skills to play on their game, an they all sucked at it they rather go on MW2 and MW3 &just Noobtube to get easy kills

RealLosoPosted:

Sound- It took them a year to "tweak" the game. I'm sorry but I don't want to play their next release if it's going to take them a year to make the game more efficient.


Good dont buy the game that leaves one less retard not playing it

WubstepPosted:

It took them a year to "tweak" the game. I'm sorry but I don't want to play their next release if it's going to take them a year to make the game more efficient.

RSPosted:

I_MAKE_IT_RAIN Treyarch Actually Is Quite Good Considering The New Infinity Ward Sucks...The Old IW Made The Campaign And That Was Amazing! Look's Like The Old IW Will Never Get The Chance To Do Another Multiplayer Game.
SledgeHammer Games Made The Multiplier With Raven And It Is Complete Garbage Compared To Black Ops Features Like Wager Matches, And Combat Training.

it was sledgehammer who messed up on that part...

zSparkzPosted:

Cant wait to see what Treyarch does for the next title! They did a really good job with Black Ops in my opinion. I loved the multiplayer maps, guns, leveling, just about everything. Another really great thing that they did was making an Original campaign, they started from scratch and made it awesome!

I_MAKE_IT_RAINPosted:

Treyarch Actually Is Quite Good Considering The New Infinity Ward Sucks...The Old IW Made The Campaign And That Was Amazing! Look's Like The Old IW Will Never Get The Chance To Do Another Multiplayer Game.
SledgeHammer Games Made The Multiplier With Raven And It Is Complete Garbage Compared To Black Ops Features Like Wager Matches, And Combat Training.