Battlefield 5 may not allow players to rent their own servers

3.8
After months of uncertainty, DICE has finally shared an update about the Rent a Server Program for Battlefield 5.

Since before Battlefield 5’s release, the developer has been especially vague about whether or not players can expect the return of Rent a Server Program (RSP) at or around launch.

Being able to rent your own server has been a staple feature in Battlefield games, and it’s a key way to building communities around the game. Having access to player-run servers also extends a game’s life beyond the end of its official support. This is why, for example, you can easily still find active Battlefield 4, 3, and even Bad Company 2 servers to this day.

But with Battlefield 5, DICE never gave a satisfactory answer to these demands one way or another. Until this week, when global community manager Dan Mitre decided to offer a transparent – albeit disappointing – response about the fate of RSP.

“I’m going to keep it simple. You haven’t seen an update in our direction with RSP because we haven’t made a full decision internally whether or not we can deliver it,” Mitre wrote on Reddit.




“RSP needs to meet standards and your expectations with the tools we provide – that takes development resources. It also needs to make economical development sense – we can’t introduce a feature that ends up costing more to keep maintained than it returns (I know that statement will open up more debate, and I encourage that, but this is the reality of the situation).

“In other words, we don’t want to impact development resources of main game quality of life commitment and upcoming content by routing team bandwidth to RSP development. There’s also financial implications here that go well beyond my remit.”


The community manager then reiterated that RSP is not completely off the table, but a final decision has yet to be made. When that happens, Mitre assured players it’ll be communicated officially.

“Our teams need to weigh this carefully and either commit fully to the service or not provide it at all,” he added.


The lack of player-run servers isn’t a massive issue right now, especially with the current state of Battlefield 5, but not having the option will undoubtedly cut the life of the game short. Until we know for certain, we’ll just have to stick with official servers and hope for the best.

Posted:
Related Forum: Gaming Discussion

Source: https://www.vg247.com/2019/01/24/battlefield-5-server-rental-rsp-dice-response/

Comments

"Battlefield 5 may not allow players to rent their own servers" :: Login/Create an Account :: 10 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

JasonPosted:

This is completely dumb, when we were able to rent our own servers the connection was great for me.

Two_FacedPosted:

OGTrey079
XBL-AB
legacy1567 Always hated player owned servers especially when u get kicked for killing the owner or do so well they move you to the opposite team


This is exactly why i think this is a good idea


I don't know what servers you be joining but I've never had that happen once and I been playing every battlefield on pc since bad company 2


Yeah what exactly are you talking about lol

OGTrey079Posted:

XBL-AB
legacy1567 Always hated player owned servers especially when u get kicked for killing the owner or do so well they move you to the opposite team


This is exactly why i think this is a good idea


I don't know what servers you be joining but I've never had that happen once and I been playing every battlefield on pc since bad company 2

OGTrey079Posted:

Mike Im sure if this were possible there would be some great exploits


Not really they had it in bc2 bf3 and bf4 there were no problems if anything those servers were better offering higher tick rates

MikePosted:

Im sure if this were possible there would be some great exploits

XBL-ABPosted:

legacy1567 Always hated player owned servers especially when u get kicked for killing the owner or do so well they move you to the opposite team


This is exactly why i think this is a good idea

CTVPosted:

Yikes. This should've been something focused on before the game was made. If renting out servers to your community wont make you money with the resources if takes to keep up the server then why make a big game in the first place? Not a great idea for a company that doesn't want to give the community the smallest bit of power of their own game.

MazePosted:

A little too late for them to still be deciding. what a joke.

legacy1567Posted:

Always hated player owned servers especially when u get kicked for killing the owner or do so well they move you to the opposite team

RedactedPosted:

Sounds like major disappointment to me