3CH wroteI can't say I agree with this.. Games are better than they have ever been half finished or not. There is more content, options, availability, genres, than there has ever been in the industry. Can projects get rushed due to large oversight from companies and publishers with too much money and too many investors? Yeah, absolutely. But even those game when they come out are some of the better games even released. And there are PLENTY of godly developers right now that still take their time and release masterpieces of gaming. CDProjekt Red is a great example of this, and in the same breath people openly hate on them for delays. TW3 is one of the best games ever released, period. The breathtaking landscapes, the massive open world, the story telling.. But do you think gaming would *honestly* be better if every developer took 7-10 years per project? I think the correct word for the landscape of gaming right now is saturated, there's a lot more money and a lot more players than ever before. But you can still find amazing titles and developers. Even if it's not every title released.
Well you should expect for it to improve, thats certainly a given, technology improved and gaming became more of a norm then before.
While in the long run a game will have more content out, it take's forever.
For example when I was playing Pubg there were bugs in that game such as walking through walls and shit that lasted for nearly 8 months with no fix.
H1Z1 same shit, it went to the trash for many different reasons.
According to much of what I have seen (obviously its skewed because of the bias i have) an overwhelming number of people kind of got sick with how CoD went especially this new CoD not having prestige's and just overall loot boxes and crap.
Valve hasn't really produced game's, CSGO had a fk ton of bugs which many professional players complained about for the longest time ever.
Not saying every game is bad, but many big developers went a complete different route with how they're bringing out game's, everything is more focused on gaining money then before. Playing game's early on is bound to have a crap ton of bugs but having the same bugs for months on months is not appealing to gamers.
Im gonna bring up fortnite again. Fortnite constantly drops updates on updates and many bugs and shit gets fixed right away. They have money to do so obviously but other companies like bluehole had the cash also, PUBG was the biggest game on steam they were racking up cash but they couldn't fix all the game breaking bugs?
I agree with much of what you said but having a lot of content is kind of just expected since technology grew and more people are gaming now because it just became more of the norm to do so then before. I don't know about the 7 years part, game's taking 2 years imo is the max it should take to launch out the game.
While game's are launched out quicker now as I said with the PUBG situation, it was just a great idea but it was rushed out causing for very needed updates.
It's all perspective at the end of the day, there's also a lot of shit that goes on such as trends in the gaming scene.
I.e battle royale is in