You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Malcolm Butler Allegations
Posted:

Malcolm Butler AllegationsPosted:

QT
  • Summer 2018
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 30, 20149Year Member
Posts: 5,781
Reputation Power: 3272
Motto: QuikTrip
Motto: QuikTrip
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 30, 20149Year Member
Posts: 5,781
Reputation Power: 3272
Motto: QuikTrip
Malcolm Butler has had allegations that he was benched because of weed.

He denies it. The patriots haven't talked directly about this matter.

Do you think they benched him for that reason? Would you bench him for that reason?
#2. Posted:
Savitar
  • E3 2017
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 04, 20158Year Member
Posts: 4,200
Reputation Power: 72
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 04, 20158Year Member
Posts: 4,200
Reputation Power: 72
You don't bench your best defensive player who's already becoming a FA for weed. That makes no sense. So no.
#3. Posted:
Zydrin
  • Winter 2018
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 17, 201310Year Member
Posts: 12,476
Reputation Power: 1973
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 17, 201310Year Member
Posts: 12,476
Reputation Power: 1973
Absolutely not. Not in the Super Bowl when no proof was provided. Not at all.
#4. Posted:
Until
  • Ladder Climber
Status: Offline
Joined: May 08, 20149Year Member
Posts: 367
Reputation Power: 37
Status: Offline
Joined: May 08, 20149Year Member
Posts: 367
Reputation Power: 37
Nope they can't just throw allegations and assume stuff like that without proof
#5. Posted:
Voro
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 24, 201112Year Member
Posts: 4,709
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 24, 201112Year Member
Posts: 4,709
Reputation Power: 377
Nah, not for weed. Especially with no proof of it.


Would be quite interesting to know why he was benched though
#6. Posted:
hoot
  • Tutorial Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 20149Year Member
Posts: 3,313
Reputation Power: 1427
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 20149Year Member
Posts: 3,313
Reputation Power: 1427
Savitar wrote You don't bench your best defensive player who's already becoming a FA for weed. That makes no sense. So no.


I second this. I don't see the sense in them benching him for weed.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.