You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.

Do you think ISIS should be taken out?

Yes
89.45% (178 votes)
No
10.55% (21 votes)

Total Votes: 199

#31. Posted:
-Dylan_
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 29, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,649
Reputation Power: 65
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 29, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,649
Reputation Power: 65
Miss wrote
-Dylan_ wrote
Miss wrote
-Dylan_ wrote
Literate wrote
-Dylan_ wrote Keep bombing them! This is the first time I have agreed with Obama's decisions during his whole entire presidency.


8 Civilians for every 30 militants dead.
You find that acceptable?


I guess so. If it stops them from attempting to penetrate America, do what needs to be done.


That's the problem with this world right here.


What's the problem? Explain. Is it bad that I think if a terrorist group is beheading our citizens that we should attack them?


That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about what you said about the civilians. We're all humans, we can't just treat those civilians there like dirt just because they're not 'American'. How would you like it if say USUS (Cheap knock off of ISIS, USA version) was here in America doing what ISIS was doing and say Russia was bombing them and killing civilians here? Would you say that's fine too?


Of course I'd be against it, who wouldn't? We don't have terrorist groups so maybe they should take control of their country and buckle down on everything. Also, how do you think we should combat ISIS? Without civilian casualties?
#32. Posted:
Miss
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
-Dylan_ wrote
Miss wrote
-Dylan_ wrote
Miss wrote
-Dylan_ wrote
Literate wrote
-Dylan_ wrote Keep bombing them! This is the first time I have agreed with Obama's decisions during his whole entire presidency.


8 Civilians for every 30 militants dead.
You find that acceptable?


I guess so. If it stops them from attempting to penetrate America, do what needs to be done.


That's the problem with this world right here.


What's the problem? Explain. Is it bad that I think if a terrorist group is beheading our citizens that we should attack them?


That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about what you said about the civilians. We're all humans, we can't just treat those civilians there like dirt just because they're not 'American'. How would you like it if say USUS (Cheap knock off of ISIS, USA version) was here in America doing what ISIS was doing and say Russia was bombing them and killing civilians here? Would you say that's fine too?


Of course I'd be against it, who wouldn't? We don't have terrorist groups so maybe they should take control of their country and buckle down on everything. Also, how do you think we should combat ISIS? Without civilian casualties?


Well, they did actually. Iraq tried to at first, but they couldn't because most of ISIS weapons are American and most of them are American trained. Remember the Syrian rebels we armed and aided? Most of them are now in ISIS.

How do I think? Maybe talk to them? I don't know, just maybe, just maybe, that'll work. I don't know about you, but bombing them obviously doesn't work, and isn't going to, as a matter of fact, that is what actually is making them stronger as a whole and making them more aggravated. I don't understand how people can't see that.

By the way, I in now way support ISIS or what they're doing. I'm just trying to look at a different approach to the situation. Everyone's first thought to when something like this happens, is to immediately bomb them. Like what? Why would you do that? Their's no logic to it. Bombing them and being over there in the first place is what made them what they are today.
#33. Posted:
-Dylan_
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 29, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,649
Reputation Power: 65
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 29, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,649
Reputation Power: 65
Miss wrote
-Dylan_ wrote
Miss wrote
-Dylan_ wrote
Miss wrote
-Dylan_ wrote
Literate wrote
-Dylan_ wrote Keep bombing them! This is the first time I have agreed with Obama's decisions during his whole entire presidency.


8 Civilians for every 30 militants dead.
You find that acceptable?


I guess so. If it stops them from attempting to penetrate America, do what needs to be done.


That's the problem with this world right here.


What's the problem? Explain. Is it bad that I think if a terrorist group is beheading our citizens that we should attack them?


That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about what you said about the civilians. We're all humans, we can't just treat those civilians there like dirt just because they're not 'American'. How would you like it if say USUS (Cheap knock off of ISIS, USA version) was here in America doing what ISIS was doing and say Russia was bombing them and killing civilians here? Would you say that's fine too?


Of course I'd be against it, who wouldn't? We don't have terrorist groups so maybe they should take control of their country and buckle down on everything. Also, how do you think we should combat ISIS? Without civilian casualties?


Well, they did actually. Iraq tried to at first, but they couldn't because most of ISIS weapons are American and most of them are American trained. Remember the Syrian rebels we armed and aided? Most of them are now in ISIS.

How do I think? Maybe talk to them? I don't know, just maybe, just maybe, that'll work. I don't know about you, but bombing them obviously doesn't work, and isn't going to, as a matter of fact, that is what actually is making them stronger as a whole and making them more aggravated. I don't understand how people can't see that.

By the way, I in now way support ISIS or what they're doing. I'm just trying to look at a different approach to the situation. Everyone's first thought to when something like this happens, is to immediately bomb them. Like what? Why would you do that? Their's no logic to it. Bombing them and being over there in the first place is what made them what they are today.


I understand where you're coming from but talking to them won't do anything... They'll say ok w.e and then we think they aren't a threat anymore... Well then they come and attack us out of no where. I wish the bombs only killed the terrorists, that would be a lot better, but if we wipe ISIS off the face of the earth, we'll (hopefully) not have to deal with them anymore.
#34. Posted:
Casca
  • Winter 2017
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 01, 200915Year Member
Posts: 3,885
Reputation Power: 2122
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 01, 200915Year Member
Posts: 3,885
Reputation Power: 2122
For all of you that are still unclear about the situation I thought this might help.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Just a little humor


Groovy
#35. Posted:
Miss
  • Winter 2017
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
First off, I know this isn't really 'news', but I thought maybe some of you would be interested in knowing what the US and it's allies use to bomb them.

The Syrian bombing campaign was the combat debut of the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor. The stealth fighter had a rough road to being actually used in combat, running over-budget and plagued by glitches. The Pentagon declared it combat-ready a decade ago.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


The US Navy fired 47 Raytheon Tomahawk cruise missiles at targets in Syria. The number may sound relatively small, considering an estimated stockpile of 4,000 such missiles the US has. But its much more impressive if you bear in mind that the Navy plans to buy only 100 in 2015 and none thereafter due to budget cuts.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


An expected ensemble of other US combat aircraft, such as F-15 Strike Eagles, F-16s, B-1 bombers, is participating in the sorties.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


Along with Predator and Reaper drones, armed with Hellfire missiles.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
#36. Posted:
Lia
  • Athlete
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201311Year Member
Posts: 4,037
Reputation Power: 4201
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201311Year Member
Posts: 4,037
Reputation Power: 4201
Three European nations committed to joining the global fight against the Islamic State, the militant group commonly known as ISIS, on Friday. Early in the day, Denmark and Belgium pledged to aid the United States in carrying out airstrikes in Iraq and outlined their plans to deploy fighter jets against the extremist group. Later in the afternoon, British lawmakers voted 524-43 in favor of launching airstrikes in Iraq.

We must fight against torture, against decapitations, so its time to act, said Veli Yuksel, a Belgian lawmaker, in a press conference. Belgium approved the motion to deploy six fighter jets in Iraq and aid in the airstrikes in a 114-2 vote. In May, a veteran Islamic militant from Syria shot and killed four people at a Jewish museum in Brussels.

Earlier on Friday, British Prime Minister David Cameron implored a skeptical House of Commons to consider involvement. Camerons impassioned speech included visceral descriptions about ISISs penchant for beheadings and likened the groups goals to something from the Dark Ages.

Well i guess its time to act, but im surprised about Denmark and Belgium joining

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
#37. Posted:
ISIS
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 20149Year Member
Posts: 268
Reputation Power: 14
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 20149Year Member
Posts: 268
Reputation Power: 14
Communism wrote Three European nations committed to joining the global fight against the Islamic State, the militant group commonly known as ISIS, on Friday. Early in the day, Denmark and Belgium pledged to aid the United States in carrying out airstrikes in Iraq and outlined their plans to deploy fighter jets against the extremist group. Later in the afternoon, British lawmakers voted 524-43 in favor of launching airstrikes in Iraq.

We must fight against torture, against decapitations, so its time to act, said Veli Yuksel, a Belgian lawmaker, in a press conference. Belgium approved the motion to deploy six fighter jets in Iraq and aid in the airstrikes in a 114-2 vote. In May, a veteran Islamic militant from Syria shot and killed four people at a Jewish museum in Brussels.

Earlier on Friday, British Prime Minister David Cameron implored a skeptical House of Commons to consider involvement. Camerons impassioned speech included visceral descriptions about ISISs penchant for beheadings and likened the groups goals to something from the Dark Ages.

Well i guess its time to act, but im surprised about Denmark and Belgium joining

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Whats more surprising is that Russia hasn't warned them about attacking them.
#38. Posted:
Lood
  • E3 2016
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 18, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,175
Reputation Power: 911
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 18, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,175
Reputation Power: 911
I kind of want to see who said ISIS shouldn't be taken out. This situation is horrible and all too surreal. I have never in my lifetime experienced fearing my safety until now. I just feel like ISIS is actually capable of doing something and it scares me.
#39. Posted:
ISIS
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 20149Year Member
Posts: 268
Reputation Power: 14
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 20149Year Member
Posts: 268
Reputation Power: 14
Alfa wrote I kind of want to see who said ISIS shouldn't be taken out. This situation is horrible and all too surreal. I have never in my lifetime experienced fearing my safety until now. I just feel like ISIS is actually capable of doing something and it scares me.
If you're talking about nuclear wise no nothing like that is going to happen because they don't have that. The only thing I fear is the US troops going in to eliminate ISIS.
#40. Posted:
Lood
  • Gold Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 18, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,175
Reputation Power: 911
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 18, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,175
Reputation Power: 911
AnimeHypedUp wrote
Alfa wrote I kind of want to see who said ISIS shouldn't be taken out. This situation is horrible and all too surreal. I have never in my lifetime experienced fearing my safety until now. I just feel like ISIS is actually capable of doing something and it scares me.
If you're talking about nuclear wise no nothing like that is going to happen because they don't have that. The only thing I fear is the US troops going in to eliminate ISIS.
No I know that won't happen. I think that is a tad bit out of their range in terms of funding. I am talking about the supposed terrorists ISIS has on ground in the US. And why do you fear the US troops fighting ISIS?
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.