You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#31. Posted:
Motioncorey
  • 2 Million
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 201112Year Member
Posts: 970
Reputation Power: 38
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 201112Year Member
Posts: 970
Reputation Power: 38
ProJimmyRustler wrote
Motioncorey wrote I stopped reading after the first sentence because I knew you didn't read the whole thing. Felt hypocritical, and then read it all. Laughed when you said you didn't read which made me regret reading your post. And even so, you took this topic and went way too far into to. Focusing on DLC and Black Ops 3 when in reality, the main point of this was to not judge a game based off what was initially just a trailer.

EDIT: TL:DR? Was yours not twice as long as mine?


What is your point? I don't agree with you and now you feel the need to be a dick about it?

I read the topic. You obviously don't know that TL:DR can be used to summarize a long comment, as well as a long post. The purpose of it is to give a sorter version of my wall of text, but you are too ignorant to notice that.
I gave valid reasons why I am judging the game before it came out. My point was that the game is turning into garbage and I won't be supporting it.
Don't post in the rant section if you don't expect people to disagree with you.
Ignorant? Really? The only reason I went and said what I said was because in my opinion, you were diving way too deep into what was initially talked about. I was talking about strictly gameplay. When people refuse to adapt to the idea of advanced movement. You were talking about that, and everything else. And I already know people are going to disagree. It's a Call of Duty topic. What I don't like, is when someone says "TL:DR", yet still posts their opinion. Yeah I get how you have every right to, but by reading your response, it appeared that you didn't understand where I was coming from
#32. Posted:
Motioncorey
  • 2 Million
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 201112Year Member
Posts: 970
Reputation Power: 38
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 201112Year Member
Posts: 970
Reputation Power: 38
Pozeh wrote People including me want boots on the ground with realistic setting, not this futuristic stuff. I really dont care how good the game is, if its not boots on the ground than im dont wanna play it
And I respect that. I really do. It's just where people trash a game before even seeing multiplayer gameplay, you know?
#33. Posted:
Slade_Wilson
  • E3 2016
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 29, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,345
Reputation Power: 131
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 29, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,345
Reputation Power: 131
Disguise wrote I still think this game should've been Ghosts 2.


I really wanted a Ghosts 2. I don't know why people hated Ghosts so much, imo it was better than AW & BO3 put together. Ghosts ended perfectly for a sequel & yet they let it die.
#34. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5,508
Reputation Power: 3882
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5,508
Reputation Power: 3882
I know there hasn't been much footage, but I can't wait for the game! Already preordered it
#35. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5,508
Reputation Power: 3882
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5,508
Reputation Power: 3882
Young_Jayy wrote I'm truthfully only buying it for the cod4 remastered


That's what a lot of people are saying, but i'm sure they'll play Infinite Warfare too
#36. Posted:
Urth
  • Gold Gifter
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,556
Reputation Power: 142
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,556
Reputation Power: 142
Nah this game will not compare to any of the CODs other than Advanced Warfare. Future is bad. Bring back the modern style combat
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.