Call of Duty Advanced Warfare multiplayer 'a big step forward'

4.2
Sledgehammer Games has said its debut Call of Duty title will shake up the series' tried and trusted multiplayer offering.

Set in the 2054, Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare's campaign features mech suits, hover bikes and directed energy weapons, among other futuristic gear and vehicles, some of which will also be included in the game's multiplayer component.

Sledgehammer co-founder Glen Schofield told Metro: "We'll have our own style. The exoskeletons are definitely in there and that's the core of the game."

Fellow studio co-founder Michael Condrey said: "Our multiplayer has what I'm going to call the biggest set of new, as you call it, cool gear that you've seen in a long time.

"It's a big step forward, from three years in development we've been able to innovate across the game. Everything you saw today... just imagine what that's going to mean for multiplayer. You're going to find that new is what it's all about."

Condrey also told Forbes: "On the highest level, the Advanced soldier which our E3 demo showcased is the Advanced soldier you'll see in multiplayer."

The Call of Duty Advanced Warfare release date is November 4 on Xbox 360, Xbox One, PS3, PS4 and PC.



Posted:
Related Forum: Call of Duty Forum

Source: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/468881/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-multiplayer-a-big-step-forward-for-the-series/

Comments

"Call of Duty Advanced Warfare multiplayer 'a big step forward'" :: Login/Create an Account :: 72 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

PryzelPosted:

I really hope it is a step forward but they say this with everyone that comes out so I am starting to really doubt this one will be any different to the others even with next-gen...

JRMHPosted:

XxTOXIICxKiNGxX And it still won't have 64 player MP with Battlefield sized maps, or vehicles, or anything decent. Call of Duty is dead, every IW game has been **** except for MW2 and COD4. If it wasn't for BO2, the series would be completely dead.


>64 players
>Battlefield Sized Maps
Yup, we definitely want battlefield sized maps, that's how call of duty was meant to be player. Cod gameplay is frustrating enough on ground war, why would I want 64 players? I don't understand how you're still butthurt when this actually just means the COD series is dead... I will never understand BF fanboys.

XxTOXIICxKiNGxXPosted:

And it still won't have 64 player MP with Battlefield sized maps, or vehicles, or anything decent. Call of Duty is dead, every IW game has been shit except for MW2 and COD4. If it wasn't for BO2, the series would be completely dead.

XBL-ABPosted:

Hei I love how people b*tch about CoD every year, but yet we still see their fat a**'s in line waiting to get the game.


Still not impressed there is COD kiddies lurking in this topic trying to defend a dying game series...

Again, the game only gets buyers because of its campaign and zombies.
The community is dying and I hope the companies die along with it.

They ruined it since Ghosts and partially MW3.
Terrible games although I get them for free. I am not paying some cheap company that copy-pastes most code from one game to the other and calls it "New engine" "A whole new era"
More like a whole new piece of crap.

FriskyPandaPosted:

dont they say the same shit every single new call of duty release? its getting **** old. cod ghosts had a dog in it and you can be a female. A **** FEMALE AND A DOG OMG ITS REVOLUTIONARY

Evanrude10Posted:

I am hoping this call of duty will be something different but I'm pretty skeptical as of now, I mean it "looks" cool but then again so does every call of duty and all of the newest installments have turned out to be garbage, We will just have to wait and see how it is

vWatsoncPosted:

all they need to add is titans and this will be exactly the same as titan fall XD

1989Posted:

I don't even know if I want to get this

itomniPosted:

Rodgers96
SamBoy991 Cod games these days are only successful because its COD. Yeah cod was a good game once upon a time. Now its like they cant be asked to make them any good or put effort into them as they know they will get alot of money from it anyway. And now we have 3 companies making a cod game..

- Treyarch
- Infinity Ward
- Sledgehammer games

Now why dont they just all team up and make one cod instead of making a cod every year with the same ********. Take the time and add all the best things into cod. For example.. Zombies. An online with decent maps.. not a low amount of maps. A good 30 maps instead of the same boring ones all the time. a campaign with co-op so more will play the campaign. Most players dont even bother playing the campaign. So again.. the company pretty much wasting there time making a campaign if no-one will be playing it.


a lot of people play the campaign so you're point is invalid, you're speaking for the minority not the majority.


hes correct you have no proof you just made a hater comment and it was quit sad

SoxPosted:

Rodgers96
SamBoy991 Cod games these days are only successful because its COD. Yeah cod was a good game once upon a time. Now its like they cant be asked to make them any good or put effort into them as they know they will get alot of money from it anyway. And now we have 3 companies making a cod game..

- Treyarch
- Infinity Ward
- Sledgehammer games

Now why dont they just all team up and make one cod instead of making a cod every year with the same ********. Take the time and add all the best things into cod. For example.. Zombies. An online with decent maps.. not a low amount of maps. A good 30 maps instead of the same boring ones all the time. a campaign with co-op so more will play the campaign. Most players dont even bother playing the campaign. So again.. the company pretty much wasting there time making a campaign if no-one will be playing it.


I agree, they should make the campain co op, just like on WAW that was great.

Anyway, i wont be buying this but i just wanted to add that