You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Dirtbike Photo Edit
Posted:
Dirtbike Photo EditPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,737
Reputation Power: 448
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,737
Reputation Power: 448
If you cropped the sides to get rid of the tree
it would look even better.
it would look even better.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 01, 20158Year Member
Posts: 600
Reputation Power: 45
Even without the edit, its a mad picture man.
Maybe if we cropped Criticals head off he might
stop talking crap lol.
Maybe if we cropped Criticals head off he might
stop talking crap lol.
- 2useful
- 1not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 20158Year Member
Posts: 2,261
Reputation Power: 332
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 20158Year Member
Posts: 2,261
Reputation Power: 332
I personally wouldn't take criticals advice as then there would be random branches at the side of th picture where imo looks retarded...it looks good as it is!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,737
Reputation Power: 448
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,737
Reputation Power: 448
INX wrote Even without the edit, its a mad picture man.
Maybe if we cropped Criticals head off he might
stop talking crap lol.
-2K16 wrote I personally wouldn't take criticals advice as then there would be random branches at the side of th picture where imo looks retarded...it looks good as it is!
I'm not sure what you guys mean.
I think something like this would pretty **** sweet.
You could make a poster out of it and what not.
clearly Illustrated needs to spend more time on it then I did.
Oh BTW I see that you figured out how to adjust the aperture.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
CriticaI wroteIf you cropped the sides to get rid of the tree
it would look even better.
I already cropped the left side (even in the "original"). It was more of a horizontal photo before, but I wanted to make it into thirds.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
CriticaI wroteINX wrote Even without the edit, its a mad picture man.
Maybe if we cropped Criticals head off he might
stop talking crap lol.
-2K16 wrote I personally wouldn't take criticals advice as then there would be random branches at the side of th picture where imo looks retarded...it looks good as it is!
I'm not sure what you guys mean.
I think something like this would pretty **** sweet.
You could make a poster out of it and what not.
clearly Illustrated needs to spend more time on it then I did.
Oh BTW I see that you figured out how to adjust the aperture.
That would looks awesome as a phone background or something.
Although I have not yet looked into the aperture, this photo is of me, unfortunately not by me.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,737
Reputation Power: 448
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,737
Reputation Power: 448
Illustrated wroteCriticaI wroteIf you cropped the sides to get rid of the tree
it would look even better.
I already cropped the left side (even in the "original"). It was more of a horizontal photo before, but I wanted to make it into thirds.
If you are talking about the rule of thirds.
The rule of thirds doesn't always have to be used.
It is just recommended.
And you already had the rule of thirds because the biker was in the upper 2 thirds of the picture.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
CriticaI wroteIllustrated wroteCriticaI wroteIf you cropped the sides to get rid of the tree
it would look even better.
I already cropped the left side (even in the "original"). It was more of a horizontal photo before, but I wanted to make it into thirds.
If you are talking about the rule of thirds.
The rule of thirds doesn't always have to be used.
It is just recommended.
And you already had the rule of thirds because the biker was in the upper 2 thirds of the picture.
Here's the full, original photo if you care to see that.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,737
Reputation Power: 448
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,737
Reputation Power: 448
If don't want to crop it as much
try painting out some of the trees.
then put a slight blur over it so it blends better.
try painting out some of the trees.
then put a slight blur over it so it blends better.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.