You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Keep Jackson on the 20 ?
Yes
36.36% (4 votes)
36.36% (4 votes)
No
63.64% (7 votes)
63.64% (7 votes)
Total Votes: 11
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201112Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201112Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Hei wrote Why fix something that isn't broken...
Because professional victims need to have something to complain about.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201211Year Member
Posts: 5,468
Reputation Power: 245
I'm totally for Harriet Tubman being on the $20 bill. If they made a positive and major impact on this country, then I am totally fine with it.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 13, 201410Year Member
Posts: 718
Reputation Power: 33
I'm not American, I'm Australian but I feel like that you shouldn't change something that's part of society and has been for a long time. It's uncalled for and its's seriously annoying because everything is either sexist or women don't get a fair go which is not true. Why should you Americans change a significant part of society?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 28, 201211Year Member
Posts: 5,836
Reputation Power: 340
Indium wrote I'm not American, I'm Australian but I feel like that you shouldn't change something that's part of society and has been for a long time. It's uncalled for and its's seriously annoying because everything is either sexist or women don't get a fair go which is not true. Why should you Americans change a significant part of society?
The mindset of not changing anything because its old is stupid. Ill give you a perfect example, roundabouts [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] why the hell do we have them in the US in this day and age? We dont drive horses anymore and these are super dangerous.. Im assuming youre all for keeping these on the roads because they are old too.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201112Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201112Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
SBE wroteIndium wrote I'm not American, I'm Australian but I feel like that you shouldn't change something that's part of society and has been for a long time. It's uncalled for and its's seriously annoying because everything is either sexist or women don't get a fair go which is not true. Why should you Americans change a significant part of society?
The mindset of not changing anything because its old is stupid. Ill give you a perfect example, roundabouts [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] why the hell do we have them in the US in this day and age? We dont drive horses anymore and these are super dangerous.. Im assuming youre all for keeping these on the roads because they are old too.
I agree that not changing anything because it's old is stupid.
Cough get rid of the stupid ass monarch in England cough
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 27, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,766
Reputation Power: 54
I honestly think that the person that contributed the most to the US that is not on any of the cash is 11th President Polk. Probably the best 1 term president. He got almost everything he promised to get done in his 1 term and said he would not run for reelection. I don't think any other president can say that.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 07, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,094
Reputation Power: 82
I suppose it's better than old white slave owners
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.