You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Rate these logos?
Posted:
Rate these logos?Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 201211Year Member
Posts: 775
Reputation Power: 31
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 201211Year Member
Posts: 775
Reputation Power: 31
If anyone here plays KSP, you may know about the logo competition where you have to make logos for the companies in the game. Well here are mine so far.
C7:
StrutCo:
R&D (Brace yourself, this one is bad!):
Zaltonic (This one is bad as well):
Thanks for checking these out, if you could leave a rating out of 10 and some feedback that would be AWESOME!
EDIT
Last edited by joeisjoe5 ; edited 2 times in total
C7:
StrutCo:
R&D (Brace yourself, this one is bad!):
Zaltonic (This one is bad as well):
Thanks for checking these out, if you could leave a rating out of 10 and some feedback that would be AWESOME!
EDIT
For those of you who haven't played KSP, here is some info on the companies I did to help explain the logos.
C7 makes plane parts
StrutCo make struts (basically metal rods to hold your rockets together)
R&D is research & development, this is where you go to unlock new parts.
Zaltonic make batteries
C7 makes plane parts
StrutCo make struts (basically metal rods to hold your rockets together)
R&D is research & development, this is where you go to unlock new parts.
Zaltonic make batteries
Last edited by joeisjoe5 ; edited 2 times in total
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 07, 201410Year Member
Posts: 786
Reputation Power: 24
C7: I really like this one. Take out the words at the bottom and it'll be a good logo.
StrutCo: It would be alright w/o the beams going everywhere. Also, what's the world represent?
R&D: Could use some improvement. Why did you upload it if you think it's bad?
Zaltonic: It would be great if it were better quality and wasn't in an octagon.
Good job!
StrutCo: It would be alright w/o the beams going everywhere. Also, what's the world represent?
R&D: Could use some improvement. Why did you upload it if you think it's bad?
Zaltonic: It would be great if it were better quality and wasn't in an octagon.
Good job!
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 201211Year Member
Posts: 775
Reputation Power: 31
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 201211Year Member
Posts: 775
Reputation Power: 31
TRSN wrote C7: I really like this one. Take out the words at the bottom and it'll be a good logo.
StrutCo: It would be alright w/o the beams going everywhere. Also, what's the world represent?
R&D: Could use some improvement. Why did you upload it if you think it's bad?
Zaltonic: It would be great if it were better quality and wasn't in an octagon.
Good job!
C7: Thanks, I have another version w/o the extra words
StrutCo: Haha, I assume you haven't played KSP. Struts are the 'beams' that you use to make the rockets you build stronger and StrutCo is the imaginary manufacturer. So thats why the 'beams' are there and thats why they will remain there. The planet is 'Kerbin', its the home planet on the game.
R&D: I don't really know to be honest
Zaltonic: Yh the glowing didn't really work to well, and I am playing around with the background to get something better.
Thanks for all you feedback
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,070
Reputation Power: 53
they could be better man but keep trying bud
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 201211Year Member
Posts: 775
Reputation Power: 31
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 201211Year Member
Posts: 775
Reputation Power: 31
TTGBEAR wrote they could be better man
Any clue as to how they could be better?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 27, 201112Year Member
Posts: 6,313
Reputation Power: 40
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 27, 201112Year Member
Posts: 6,313
Reputation Power: 40
None of them really do as logos..
Maybe the top one could stretch to being a logo. All are of very poor quality. I would seriously do some research on logos before calling these logos.
Maybe the top one could stretch to being a logo. All are of very poor quality. I would seriously do some research on logos before calling these logos.
- 3useful
- 1not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 201211Year Member
Posts: 775
Reputation Power: 31
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 201211Year Member
Posts: 775
Reputation Power: 31
Asmodai wrote None of them really do as logos..
Maybe the top one could stretch to being a logo. All are of very poor quality. I would seriously do some research on logos before calling these logos.
This isn't constructive critisism, this is just blatent rudeness. You call them "poor quality" without saying why, or how they could be improved. And here is the oxford dictionary definition of a logo:
a symbol or other small design adopted by an organization to identify its products, uniform, vehicles, etc.
I think what I have done fits into this definition so please don't make pointless comments again.
- 0useful
- 3not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201310Year Member
Posts: 402
Reputation Power: 15
joeisjoe5 wroteAsmodai wrote None of them really do as logos..
Maybe the top one could stretch to being a logo. All are of very poor quality. I would seriously do some research on logos before calling these logos.
This isn't constructive critisism, this is just blatent rudeness. You call them "poor quality" without saying why, or how they could be improved. And here is the oxford dictionary definition of a logo:
a symbol or other small design adopted by an organization to identify its products, uniform, vehicles, etc.
I think what I have done fits into this definition so please don't make pointless comments again.
Grow up. They're not good. The people that say they're good are giving you pointless hope. Research logos and then you'll understand what the meaning of a logo is. Understand the meaning and you'll start producing some good work. But, if you continue just to listen to the praise that shouldn't be there then you'll never produce great work.
NOTE: Not being horrible. I'm being completely honest without sugar coating it
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 201211Year Member
Posts: 775
Reputation Power: 31
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 201211Year Member
Posts: 775
Reputation Power: 31
ySense wrotejoeisjoe5 wroteAsmodai wrote None of them really do as logos..
Maybe the top one could stretch to being a logo. All are of very poor quality. I would seriously do some research on logos before calling these logos.
This isn't constructive critisism, this is just blatent rudeness. You call them "poor quality" without saying why, or how they could be improved. And here is the oxford dictionary definition of a logo:
a symbol or other small design adopted by an organization to identify its products, uniform, vehicles, etc.
I think what I have done fits into this definition so please don't make pointless comments again.
Grow up. They're not good. The people that say they're good are giving you pointless hope. Research logos and then you'll understand what the meaning of a logo is. Understand the meaning and you'll start producing some good work. But, if you continue just to listen to the praise that shouldn't be there then you'll never produce great work.
NOTE: Not being horrible. I'm being completely honest without sugar coating it
I don't care what people think of them, but if people think they're bad/not good for what ever reason, I would like to know that reason so I can work on it.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 201112Year Member
Posts: 2,054
Reputation Power: 435
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 201112Year Member
Posts: 2,054
Reputation Power: 435
joeisjoe5 wrote I don't care what people think of them, but if people think they're bad/not good for what ever reason, I would like to know that reason so I can work on it.
Maybe if you could see past your own stubbornness,
you will see that there is meaning in the words he so chose.
'Hints' if you will, on how you can improve.
Asmodai wrote None of them really do as logos..
What he's saying here is that none of these should be classified as proper logo's.
Maybe do some simple research on finding what makes a logo, well, a logo.
It's as easy as watching a video on youtube.
Asmodai wrote All are of very poor quality..
This pretty much speaks for itself.
Quality is what separates the men from the boys,
without decent quality, it lacks levels of seriousness so to say.
And from the quality of these few pieces, it may as well have been made in paint.
Next time, see past that shield of yours,
possibly re-read and think before responding.
Not trying to be a pain, but this gets me going.
Hope you learned something out of this..
For what it matters,
-Chi
- 2useful
- 2not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.